Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
IAFO CONFERENCE 2018 GOA - http://iafo2018goa.com/ Users Online: 656 
Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
  Home | About JFDS | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Online submission | Contact us | Advertise | Login 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 42-45  

Occurrence of diversity in dental pattern and their role in identification in Indian population: An orthopantomogram based pilot study


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication25-Feb-2014

Correspondence Address:
Ajay Logani
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.127770

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objective: The objective of the study was to identify the diversity of dental pattern in the Indian population based on specific patterns of missing, filled, unrestored and impacted teeth using dental radiographs. Materials and Methodology: Three hundred dental orthopantomograph were randomly selected and observed for the occurrence of dental patterns. The frequency of occurrence of dental patterns and the diversity in dental patterns were calculated for full dentition, maxilla and mandible.Results: The incidence of the most common dental pattern formed by 32 virgin teeth was 9.3%. The diversity of dental pattern for full dentition was 99.7%. Diversity in the maxilla was 59.0% and that in the mandible was 82.0%.Conclusion:The study reveals the importance of diversity in dental patterns and their role in identification for forensic purposes.

Keywords: Dental diversity, dental patterns, forensic odontology, orthopantomogram


How to cite this article:
Kumar A, Ghosh S, Logani A. Occurrence of diversity in dental pattern and their role in identification in Indian population: An orthopantomogram based pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:42-5

How to cite this URL:
Kumar A, Ghosh S, Logani A. Occurrence of diversity in dental pattern and their role in identification in Indian population: An orthopantomogram based pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Aug 23];6:42-5. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2014/6/1/42/127770


   Introduction Top


The use of unique features of the human dentition to aid in personal identification is well accepted and documented in the forensic fraternity. [1] Being the hardest (270-350 Knop Hardness Number for enamel and dentine) structures of the human body, teeth represent an ideal means of identification in situations of advanced decomposition, fire, massive trauma or mass disaster. [2],[3],[4] Regardless of the condition of the body; it is highly likely that the teeth will be preserved, and it is this line of evidence that oftentimes proves to be the most reliable comparative tool. [3]

Identification by abnormal dental characteristic dates back to 66 A.D. when the decapitated head of Lollia Paulina, mistress of the Roman Emperor Claudius, was identified by his wife, Agrippina, based on severe malocclusion and discolored anterior teeth. [5] With recent advances in dental investigations and a more streamlined approach to practicing dentistry, dental records such as periapical radiographs, panoramic radiographs, treatment notes, dental charts, dental casts and intraoral photographs are commonly applied methods of personal investigations and post-mortem and ante-mortem comparisons. [3] Gustafson was the first to use orthopantomography in forensic practice for identification. [6] The availability of orthopantomograms (OPGs) has established this dental record as a valuable aid in comparing ante-mortem and post-mortem dental characteristics. Human identification using panoramic radiography proved to be useful not only when the whole complement of teeth is present but also when only a few (molars) are present. OPGs provide a complete view of both jaws and teeth in one image and offer advantages in terms of dental record keeping. Therefore, it can be applied more economically and practically in identifying a large number of victims from mass disasters and other calamities.

Dental comparison is based on unique characteristics of the teeth (shape and outline of teeth and restorations, supernumerary teeth, impacted teeth, fractured teeth etc.,), jaws (structure of the trabecular bone), as well as on the characteristics of any restorations or dental work (fixed or removable dentures, crowns, etc.,). By empirically observing the frequencies of dental patterns from large representative datasets, it is possible to estimate accurately the diversity of the population as a whole. [7] If only three possible characteristics for each tooth (such as its structural intactness, presence of restoration or absence of tooth) are utilized, the possible combinations of characteristics can give rise, in theory, to trillions of possible dental patterns, which could allow the identification process to be quantified. [3],[7] Thus, dental patterns provide a valuable instrument of comparison in human identification. It has been correctly reported that, there is sufficient dental diversity between people to enable a scientifically-based human identification method to be developed for forensic purposes. [7] The present study is a pilot study for further research in the field of post-mortem identification of especially in mass disaster and tragedies.


   Materials and Methodology Top


The present study was designed with a view to study the larger databases as an easy and feasible way of keeping records for identification. Three hundred OPGs were randomly selected from those stored at the Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, a tertiary health care unit in New Delhi, India. Each tooth observed on the dental radiographs and was then categorized into virgin, restored, missing or impacted [Table 1]. The collective dentition on the radiograph formed the dental pattern of that particular individual. Such a dental pattern can be distinct to a particular individual.

In the present study, OPG's of only dentulous and partially edentulous subjects were used for analysis. The authors excluded all OPG's with cyst, tumors or any maxillofacial abnormality from the study as they would itself be a distinct characteristic of that particular individual. Each dental arch (maxillary and mandibular) was divided into three segments (right posterior, anterior and left posterior) [Table 2]. The combine occurrence of missing, restored decayed and impacted formed the dental pattern of the individual [Table 3]. The OPG's were thus analyzed for the occurrence of diversity in dental pattern.
Table 1: The occurrence of dental codes on the orthopantomogram


Click here to view
Table 2: Division of dental arches into segments


Click here to view
Table 3: Distribution and occurrence of the five most commonly observed dental patterns


Click here to view


Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 11.5 version software. The test applied was descriptive statistics.


   Results Top


The most commonly observed dental pattern was formed by the combination of 32 sound (virgin) teeth, which was found in 9.3% of the sample [Table 3]. Two hundred and forty six different dental patterns were observed in the full dentition set with 228 distinct individual dental patterns, that is dental pattern observed only once in the sample [Table 4]. However, in the maxilla and the mandible, 155 and 161 dental patterns were observed respectively. The diversity of dental pattern for full dentition was 99.7%. Diversity in the maxilla was 59.0% and that in the mandible was 82.0%. The diversity was calculated as per the method by Bradley JA 2003. [8]
Table 4: Occurrence of dental pattern in maxilla, mandible and full dentition


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Forensic odontology is the branch of forensic medicine which in the interest of justice deals with the proper handling and examination of dental evidence and with the proper evaluation and presentation of the dental findings. [8] The use of dental records for forensic identification has increased in the last two decades and is well accepted worldwide. [9] More than 70% of the victims of Asian Tsunami and victims of September 11 (9/11) terrorist attack on World Trade Centre, New York, were identified through dental records. [10],[11],[12],[13] Forensic dental identification of human remains largely depends upon the comparison of post-mortem dental characteristics to ante-mortem dental information such as written records, dental casts and radiographs. OPGs are more desirable materials of antemortem evidence because of their highly objective nature when compared to other dental records. [10] OPGs are also relatively economical while also having the ability to determine normal as well as abnormal structures on a single 'snapshot'. Furthermore, OPG's are commonly used in routine dental practice and are easily available. Traditionally, forensic odontologists relied on the morphology of dental restorations (fillings, crowns, etc.,) to identify victims.

In the present study, the diversity of dental pattern for full dentition was in consonance with the study conducted by Sang-Seob Lee 2004. [14] However, the results varied greatly when the maxilla and the mandible were considered alone. The high value of diversity for full dentition implies sufficient power for personal identification. For example, the probability of finding a subject with missing third molars in the upper right and left teeth region and missing third and second molars in the lower quadrant with the entire rest teeth being sound (virgin) can be as less as 1% in a given sample.

The low rate of diversity individually in the maxilla or mandible may be attributed to the fact that the authors designed the study on the basis of only four parameters (i.e., virgin, missing, restored and impacted). The four parameters which were used in the present study were primarily for specific implementation in the Indian scenario. It was decided to exclude caries as a parameter for dental diversity as caries is a slow progressing disease and the extent of caries was not identified. Furthermore, initial radiolucency of the carious lesion can be misinterpreted with the artifact of the radiograph. And since the study was a pilot study the authors decided on studying only the four most commonly observed parameters.

The dental patterns provide an excellent tool for comparison in human identification similar to that in mtDNA. Literature suggests that there is sufficient dental diversity between people to enable a scientifically-based human identification method to be developed for forensic purposes. [6] The distinct nature of dental anatomy and the placement of custom restorations can ensure accuracy when the techniques are correctly employed. Diversity of dental patterns formed by combinations of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth can be comparable to the diversity of mtDNA sequences formed by combinations of variants at multiple polymorphic sites within the mtDNA sequence. However, the lower stability of dental pattern in the population unlike DNA which is only affected by mutation and heteroplasmy can be a disadvantage at times. [6]


   Conclusion Top


The authors suggest that the dental records can play a primary source of identification in spite of the advances in DNA identification technology. However, the authors also advocate that the results of the present study are to be used with 'caution' and more researches with a larger sample size from randomly distributed samples are necessary. The authors also emphasize the importance of dental record keeping and strict guidelines to be framed on examination and documentation of dental records in day to day clinical practice. However, despite the mentioned drawbacks of the identification method, dental information may be in several cases the only available means of identification, where most of the other popular methods of identification are completely destroyed.


   Acknowledgements Top


The authors thank Dr. Ashith B. Acharya, Department of Forensic Odontology, SDM College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad for his valuable suggestions in preparing the manuscript.

 
   References Top

1.Pretty IA, Addy LD. Associated postmortem dental findings as an aid to personal identification. Sci Justice 2002;42:65-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Gutiérrez-Salazar MD, Reyes-Gasga J. Micro hardness and chemical composition of human tooth materials research. Mater Res 2003;6:367-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Adams BJ. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:487-96.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Nambiar P, Jalil N, Singh B. The dental identification of victims of an aircraft accident in Malaysia. Int Dent J, 1997. 47, 9-15.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Stavrianos C, Kokkas A, Anderopoulos E, Eliades A. Applications of forensic dentistry: Part-1. Res J Med Sci 2010;4:179-86.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Martin-de-Las-Heras S, Valenzuela A, Luna Jde D, Bravo M. The utility of dental patterns in forensic dentistry. Forensic Sci Int 2010;195:166.e1-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Biazevic MG, de Almeida NH, Crosato E, Michel-Crosato E. Diversity of dental patterns: Application on different ages using the Brazilian National Oral Health Survey. Forensic Sci Int 2011;207:240.e1-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Petju M, Suteerayongprasert A, Thongpud R, Hassiri K. Importance of dental records for victim identification following the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in Thailand. Public Health 2007;121:251-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, Part 1. Dental identification. Br Dent J 2011;210:219-24.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Tan PH, James H. Thai tsunami victim identification overview to date. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2005;23:1-18.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Lau G, Tan WF, Tan PH. After the Indian Ocean tsunami: Singapore's contribution to the international disaster victim identification effort in Thailand. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005;34:341-51.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Sribanditmongkol P, Pongpanitanont P, Porntrakulseree N, Petju M, Kunaratanapruk S, Kitkailass P, et al., Forensic aspects of disaster casualty management tsunami victim identification in Thailand. WHO conference on health aspects of the tsunami disaster in Asia, Phuket, Thailand; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Knoppers BM, Saginur M, Cash H. Ethical Issues in Secondary Uses of Human Biological Materials from Mass Disasters. Med Ethics 2006:34,352-365  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Lee SS, Choi JH, Yoon CL, Kim CY, Shin KJ. The diversity of dental patterns in the orthopantomography and its significance in human identification. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:784-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Computerized Dental Comparison: A Critical Review of Dental Coding and Ranking Algorithms Used in Victim Identification
Bradley J. Adams,Kenneth W. Aschheim
Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016; 61(1): 76
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1852    
    Printed61    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded305    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal