Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
IAFO CONFERENCE 2018 GOA - http://iafo2018goa.com/ Users Online: 145 
Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
  Home | About JFDS | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Online submission | Contact us | Advertise | Login 


 
  Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 76-79  

Molecular insights of saliva in solving paternity dispute


1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Center, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Madhvika Patidar
MRA - A/74, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Raibarielly Road, Lucknow - 226 214, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.150325

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Everyone is born with a unique genetic blueprint i.e. its own genome. Special locations called loci on different chromosomes display predictable inheritance patterns that could be used to determine biological relationships. These locations contain specific DNA sequences, called markers, which forensic scientists use as identifying marks for individuals. Saliva is a potentially useful source of genomic DNA for genetic studies. Paternity testing is based on the premise that we inherit half our DNA from our father and half from our mother. Therefore, persons who are biologically related must share similar DNA profile. Conversely, the absence of similarities in the DNA profiles of the child and the alleged father is used as proof that no biological relationship exists. In this paper, a female complained for being raped a year back by Mr. X and accused him of being father of her 3-months-old baby girl. DNA testing was done using saliva for the child and blood sample from the mother and the suspected father. The finding presented here allows the use of saliva as an alternative source of blood.

Keywords: Deoxyribonucleic acid, human leukocyte antigen, paternity test, restriction fragment length polymorphism, short tandem repeat


How to cite this article:
Patidar M, Agrawal S, Parveen F, Khare P. Molecular insights of saliva in solving paternity dispute. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:76-9

How to cite this URL:
Patidar M, Agrawal S, Parveen F, Khare P. Molecular insights of saliva in solving paternity dispute. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 21];7:76-9. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2015/7/1/76/150325


   Introduction Top


Everyone is born with a unique genetic blueprint known as DNA. As half of the DNA of an individual is inherited from the biological mother and half from the biological father, the comparison of the DNA sequences of a person to that of another person can show if one of them is derived from the other or not. Specific sequences are usually looked at to see if they are copied verbatim from one of the individual's genome to the other. [1] Saliva is a potentially useful source of genomic DNA for genetic studies since it can be collected in a painless and non-invasive manner. [2]

Paternity testing simply means establishing fatherhood. DNA identification provides a conclusive and definitive way to establish biological relationships. Consequently, DNA testing has become the most accepted method to determine identity within the legal and scientific communities. [3]

The DNA parentage testing is the most reliable and powerful method of proving or disproving parentage for legal, personal, or medical reasons. This test also resolves disputes, and helps streamline court proceedings to settle child support and custody cases. The standard methods for paternity testing are polymerase chain reaction (PCR), short tandem repeat (STR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and DNA sequencing. These tests are sometimes ordered by courts when proof of paternity is required. [3],[4]


   Case Report Top


A female victim aged 24 years lodged a complaint in Barabanki police station for being raped a year back by Mr. X. Victim claims to be mother of his 3 months old baby (Girl) and wanted justice and compensation. The case was referred to the Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow for paternity testing. Saliva samples were collected from the oral cavity of the baby, and blood samples were collected from the mother and suspected father.


   Methods Top


Extraction of genomic DNA in both blood and salivary samples was done using phenol-chloroform method published in our previous research article. [5] It was followed by its qualitative and quantitative analysis using spectrophotometer and amplification of DNA by using PCR. Further panel of markers were selected for this purpose; few of them were used because of their positive response shown in our previous study like ApoB3'HVR, Hum-vWF-1, Hum-F13A. [6] Other STRs markers used were Hum-vWA, Hum Tho1, Hum-TPO, Hum-FES, Hum-HPRT, and Hum-FGA. All the above markers were analyzed on poly-acylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). We analyzed few of the autosomal STR markers on 310 fragment analyzer; these were D3S1342, D8S4321, and D115432. Also, we analyzed Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) gene complex markers like Class I- A, B, C and Class II- DRβ, DQα on agarose gel.


   Results Top


Analysis of Hum-vWF-1 marker [Figure 1] showed that bands in the suspected father (SF) did not match with the bands in the baby (B), whereas bands in the baby matched with the bands in mother (M). Analysis of Hum- FES marker showed that bands in the suspected father did not match with the bands in the baby, whereas one of the bands in the baby neither matched with the mother nor with the suspected father.
Figure 1: Analysis of Hum-vWF-1 marker using PAGE, L-DNA ladder

Click here to view


Analysis of HLA -A gene complex using agarose gel [Figure 2] showed that one out of 2 bands in the suspected father did not match with the bands of the baby. The analysis of HLA -C gene complex using agarose gel [Figure 3] showed that one out of 2 bands in the suspected father did not match with the bands in the baby.
Figure 2: Analysis of HLA -A gene complex using agarose gel

Click here to view
Figure 3: Analysis of HLA -C gene complex using agarose gel

Click here to view


Based on the DNA analysis, the pattern of bands revealed in the child's DNA was compared with that in the mother's DNA. All bands that matched in position and relative intensity are, or could be, maternal in origin. Thus, all of the remaining bands in the DNA fingerprint of the child must have been inherited from the biological father. In this present case, all of these remaining bands in the child were not present in the DNA fingerprint of the alleged father. This excludes Mr. X (suspected father) as the biological father of the baby because they do not share sufficient genetic markers as there was no common allele between the putative father and baby at 5 loci. Comparing the DNA sequence of suspected father, mother and the baby [Figure 4] showed that one of the sequences in the baby was solely derived from the mother. As the tested alleged father does not match the child on 3 or more genetic sites, the alleged father is not the child's biological father.
Figure 4: Comparison of the DNA sequence of suspected father, mother, and the baby

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Forensic science (Legal medicine) is a specialism that aims to help judges and juries solve legal issues, not only in criminal law but also in civil cases. [7] DNA fingerprinting is a technique used especially for identification (as for forensic purposes) by extracting and identifying the base-pair pattern of an individual's DNA. [8] It is also known as DNA typing or genetic fingerprinting. [8] The process of DNA fingerprinting was developed by Alec Jeffreys in 1984, and it first became available for paternity testing in 1988. [8]

The basic function of paternity testing is to exclude the maximum number of individuals that could be biological fathers of the child in question. This is done by identifying the obligate allele in the child and determining if the alleged father also carries this allele. [9]

For a paternity test to be considered to be of high quality, at least 16 loci must be analyzed during testing, which was done in the present case. [10] If DNA of the child and alleged father show exclusions at 3 or more loci, then the alleged father is considered to be excluded as the biological father of the child. [10] In the present case, the probability of paternity would be 0.00% as 5 of the bands present in baby did not match the bands of suspected father.

Generally, fresh whole blood or blood-stained material is the primary source of an individual's DNA used as a standard for comparison to evidentiary material in DNA typing. [11] Various studies along with our previous study have demonstrated that saliva and saliva-stained materials are good source of DNA. [5],[6],[12] Moreover, the DNA banding patterns obtained from saliva or saliva-stained material are indistinguishable from the patterns obtained from blood or hair from the same individual. [11] In the present case, since the baby was 3-months-old, fairly large volumes of saliva was collected in a painless and non-invasive manner.


   Conclusion Top


Most paternity testing is done for financial reasons, i.e. to establish legal responsibility and provide for child support. Such testing is clearly an important tool in civil courts when the paternity of a child is in question. As saliva is a rich source of genomic DNA, it can be used as an alternative source of DNA for known standards (Blood). As it is well said, it's important to give justice to the victim when the alleged father is proved to be the biological father, but it is also equally important to exclude the innocent.

 
   References Top

1.
Henry I, Hoovers J, Barichard F, Berthéas MF, Puech A, Prieur F, et al. Pericentricintrachromosomal insertion responsible for recurrence of del (11)(p13p14) in a family. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1993;7:57-62.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ng DP, Koh D, Choo SG, Ng V, Fu Q. Effect of storage conditions on the extraction of PCR-quality genomic DNA from saliva. Clin Chim Acta 2004;343:191-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ma H, Zhu H, Guan F, Cherng S. Paternity testing. JAm Sci 2006;2:76-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Klein RD, Dykas DJ, Bale AE. Clinical testing for the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome in a DNA diagnostic laboratory. Genet Med 2005;7:611-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Khare P, Chandra S, Raj V, Agarwal S. Salivary DNA for sex determination and forensic individualization. J Forensic Med Toxicol 2012;29:73-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Khare P, Raj V, Chandra S, Agarwal S. DNA extraction and gene amplification from saliva deposited on skin using double swab technique. Indian J Forensic Odont 2012;5:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jobling MA, Gill P. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:739-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Adams J. Paternity testing: Blood types and DNA. Nat Educ 2008;1:146.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schanfield M. DNA parentage testing. In: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupfer GC, editors. London: Academic Press; 2000. p. 504-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cifuentes LO, Martínez EH, Acuña MP, Jonquera HG. Probability of exclusion in paternity testing: Time to reassess. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:349-50.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Walsh DJ, Corey AC, Cotton RW, Forman L, Herrin GL Jr, Word CJ, et al. Isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from saliva and forensic science samples containing saliva. J Forensic Sci1992;37:387-95.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sweet D, Hildebrand D. Saliva from cheese bite yields DNA profile of burglar: A case report. Int J Legal Med 1999;112:201-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Point-of-Care Testing
Frederick L. Kiechle
Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology. 2015; 14(4): 157
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Case Report
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Introduction
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3030    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded239    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal