Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
IAFO CONFERENCE 2018 GOA - http://iafo2018goa.com/ Users Online: 666 
Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
  Home | About JFDS | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Online submission | Contact us | Advertise | Login 


 
  Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52-55  

Denture barcoding in forensic dentistry: A future option


Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
Jayaprakash Mugur Basavanna
Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Center, Delhi Road, Bagarpur, Moradabad - 244 001, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.176952

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Neurodegenerative disorders are commonly seen in elderly individuals. Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common example with memory loss, lack of logic, reasoning and analytical thinking. In this case report simple method of 2D Bar code technique of denture marking has been explained which will not only useful in patients with memory loss but it is very helpful in identifying the individuals in case of natural calamities like floods, earthquake, tornedo, state of unconsciousness and accidents. Such patients can be traced easily by denture barcoding. This technique is a major breakthrough in the field of forensic dentistry.

Keywords: Bar code, denture identification, neurodegenerative disorders, Parkinson's disease


How to cite this article:
Basavanna JM, Jain A, Misra SK. Denture barcoding in forensic dentistry: A future option. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8:52-5

How to cite this URL:
Basavanna JM, Jain A, Misra SK. Denture barcoding in forensic dentistry: A future option. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 17];8:52-5. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2016/8/1/52/176952


   Introduction Top


”Denture identification systems are important for hospitalized patients, patients in long-term care facilities, for forensic identification purposes, and other social reasons.”[1],[2],[3] “At times the only identifiable remains are a victim's partial or complete dentures.”[4]

Denture marking assists in the return of a lost denture and facilitates the identification of either a living or a deceased denture wearer.[5]

Parkinson's disease is the most common example of neurodegenerative disorders as there is dysfunctions of memory, logic, reasoning, and analytical thinking, these patients can be traced easily by labeling their prostheses.[6]

This study illustrates a simple technique for the incorporation of a 2-dimensional (2-D) bar code into the denture and describes its significance in the field of forensic dentistry.


   Case Report Top


A 65-year-old male patient reported to the Department of Prosthodontics with the chief complaint of needing to replace his missing teeth. The patient had a history of Parkinson's disease since 10 years and was on medication. Extraoral examination revealed a typical “mask-like” appearance of the face due to reduction in the movements of the facial muscles. The eyes were dry and had a fixed gaze [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Fixed gaze of the patient

Click here to view


Restricted lip movement was observed. There was a typical “pill-rolling” movement between thumb and fingers. The tremors spread to the legs, the face, the tongue, and the mandible.

Patient management

Before starting the treatment consent was taken from the patient by the physician.

The primary impression was recorded using putty impression (Aquasil, DENTSPLY/Caulk, Germany) [Figure 2] Type III dental stone (Kalabhai Dental Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) was used to pour the primary cast.
Figure 2: Maxillary and mandibular preliminary impressions

Click here to view


Single-step border molding was done using polyvinyl siloxane impression material of putty consistency(Aquasil, DENTSPLY/Caulk). The final impression was recorded using light-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material (Aquasil, DENTSPLY/Caulk) [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Maxillary and mandibular final impressions

Click here to view


Jaw relation was recorded tentatively because of poor neuromuscular control resulting in uncoordinated mandibular movements and variable centric relation. Hence, monoplane teeth were selected [Figure 4]. Try-in was done.
Figure 4: Maxillary and mandibular dentures showing monoplane teeth

Click here to view


Incorporation of 2-D bar code

A 2-D bar code with details such as name, gender, age, address, phone number, and medical history was generated with a code generator (QR2, Kaywa-Code Generator, beta v1.000, Kaywa AG, Zurich, Switzerland).

  • The 2-D bar code label of 10 × 10 mm in size was printed on paper and laminated
  • The laminated code was then embedded between thin films of clear autopolymerizing acrylic resin (DPI-RR Cold Cure DPI Products and Services Limited, Mumbai, India) [Figure 5]
  • The bar code was positioned on the palatal surface of the maxillary denture after the trial closure, and then curing was done in a conventional manner (prefabrication technique) [Figure 6]
  • For the mandibular denture, the label was positioned in a recess created 1 mm deep on the distolingual flange of the denture. Note that the marker may fail to decode if placed on a deep curved surface (postfabrication technique) [Figure 7]
  • The recess was filled with clear autopolymerizing acrylic resin before trimming and polishing [Figure 8]
  • A code decoder (i-nigma, v3.10.02, 3GVision, Yehuda, Israel) enabled mobile camera was held against the label for the code to be deciphered [Figure 9]
  • After a few seconds the recognized code was translated into text on a mobile screen displaying the patient's data [Figure 10]
  • Denture insertion was done [Figure 11].
Figure 5: Laminated 2D bar code

Click here to view
Figure 6: Bar code positioned on palatal surface of maxillary denture

Click here to view
Figure 7: Recess on the cameo surface on the disto-.lingual flange of the mandibular denture

Click here to view
Figure 8: Recess filled with clear auto polymerizing acrylic resin.

Click here to view
Figure 9: Bar code reader enabled mobile camera held against the denture

Click here to view
Figure 10: Mobile screen displaying the patient's data

Click here to view
Figure 11: Maxillary and mandibular labelled dentures in patient's mouth

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


It is a well-documented practice to mark dentures with surface inscription and inclusion markers.[4]

The identification of dentures may also be needed in places such as senior citizen centers or hospitals.[7]

It is obvious that only marked dentures can reveal the positive identity of a person when all other methods fail to do so. This in itself is reason enough to justify the implementation of marking of dentures.[8],[9]

The proposed method allows individual information to be recorded easily in dental offices and private dental laboratories.

Individuals suffering from Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, or any neurodegenerative disorders resulting in dementia are prone to wandering.[10] To protect these vulnerable individuals a 2-D bar code can be incorporated into their prostheses.

Labeling of dentures is recommended by most international dental associations and forensic odontologists.[11],[12] In the near future personal wander monitoring technology falling under two categories, namely, radio frequency identification (RFID) and global positioning systems (GPS) can be incorporated into different kinds of prosthesis for easy tracking of patients with such neurological disorders.[13]

The prefabrication techniques are more permanent, but induce points of weakness unless they are bonded to the acrylic resin.[1] Thus it is a technique-sensitive procedure. On the other hand, postfabrication techniques are quicker and easier but they are not permanent and may fade after subsequent use of the denture compared to the prefabrication techniques.

In this clinical trial both pre and postfabrication techniques were followed and the labels were inserted in a preparation site, which is located in the flattest portion on the cameo surfaces of the distolingual flange of the mandibular denture and the palate of the maxillary denture.[4],[5] Denture markers should be positioned in such areas where they do not interfere with either the esthetics or the function of the denture. These areas are also unaltered during postinsertion adjustments and routine wear and tear or relining procedures.[14] Hence these areas were considered for the positioning of a 2-D bar code.


   Conclusion Top


Denture barcoding plays an important role in identifying the person in case of an accident, dementia, state of unconsciousness, missing individuals, or in identifying dead bodies in natural calamities. A variety of denture marking systems have been reported in the literature. The present clinical report describes the incorporation of a 2-D bar code into the prostheses in a patient with a neurodegenerative disorder. This procedure is simple, reliable, and cost effective, thus paving a new path for identification in forensic dentistry.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

 
   References Top

1.
Ling BC. Computer-printer denture micro labeling system. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:363-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Lamb DJ. A simple method for permanent identification of dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:894.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mahoorkar S, Jain A. Denture identification using unique identification authority of India barcode. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013;5:60-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
4.
Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses - A review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:1120-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Richmond R, Pretty IA. Denture marking-patient preference of various methods. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:1338-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, Braunwald E, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, editors. 16th ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill; 2005. p. 2406-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rajendran V, Karthigeyan S, Manoharan S. Denture marker using a two-dimensional bar code. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:207-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bushick RD. Forensic dentistry: An overview for the general dentist. Gen Dent 2006;54:48-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Datta P, Sood S. The various methods and benefits of denture labeling. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:53-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.
Rajeswari CL. Prosthodontic considerations in Parkinson's disease. PJSR 2010;3:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
The ABFO Identification Guidelines. Home page 2006. Available from: http://www.forensicdentistryonline.org/Fornsic_pages_1/ident_guidelines.htm. [Last accessed on 2010 Sep 14].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Alexander PM, Taylor JA, Szuster FS, Brown KA. An assessment of attitudes to, and extent of, the practice of denture marking in South Australia. Aust Dent J 1998;43:337-41.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Secure Care Products LLC. Active RFID vs GPS Alzheimer's Tracking Devices. Available from: http://www.securecare.com/resources/active-rfid-vs-gps-alzheimers-tracking. [Last accessed on 2010 Sep 14].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Berry FA, Logan GI, Plata R, Riegel R. A postfabrication technique for identification of prosthetic devices. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:341-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2126    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded214    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal