|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 175-176
Can lip prints provide biologic evidence?
Preeti Sharma1, Neeraj Sharma2, Vijay Wadhwan1, Pooja Aggarwal1
1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 KK Dental Care Centre, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||5-Dec-2016|
Dr. Preeti Sharma
BH-15, Pallavpuram, Phase - 1, Meerut - 250 110, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Lip prints are unique and can be used in personal identification. Very few studies are available which establish them as biological evidence in the court of law. Thus, the objective of this study was to attempt to isolate DNA and obtain full short tandem repeat (STR) loci of the individual from the lip prints on different surfaces. Materials and Methods: Twelve lip prints were procured on different surfaces such as tissue paper, cotton cloth, ceramic tile, and glass surface. Latent lip prints were developed using fingerprint black powder. Lipstick-coated lip prints were also collected on the same supporting items. DNA was isolated, quantified, and amplified using IdentifilerTM kit to type 15 STR loci. Results: Ample quantity of DNA was extracted from all the lip print impressions and 15 loci were successfully located in seven samples. Fourteen loci were successfully typed in 3 lip impressions while 13 loci were typed in 2 samples. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the relevance of lip prints at the scene of crime. Extraction of DNA followed by typing of STR loci establishes the lip prints as biological evidence too. Tissue papers, napkins, cups, and glasses may have imprints of the suspect's lips. Thus, the full genetic profile is extremely useful for the forensic team.
Keywords: Biological evidence, DNA isolation, forensic odontology, forensic sciences, latent lip prints, short tandem repeat loci
|How to cite this article:|
Sharma P, Sharma N, Wadhwan V, Aggarwal P. Can lip prints provide biologic evidence?. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8:175-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Sharma P, Sharma N, Wadhwan V, Aggarwal P. Can lip prints provide biologic evidence?. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 8];8:175-6. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2016/8/3/175/195101
| Introduction|| |
Recent studies have emphasized the study of wrinkles and fine grooves on the lips; the study of which is now popularly known as cheiloscopy., It is well accepted by the forensic fraternity that lip prints are unique analogous to fingerprints and can be used for personal identification of a criminal in the court of law when no other evidence is available.,,, Forensic experts analyze the physical remains of the criminal actions, for example, in case of house burglaries, where the specific modus operandi of the offender can be conveniently recognized by the investigating police officer. Although fingerprints are the most accepted physical evidence at the crime scene, it is also not infrequent to find latent lip prints on glasses, cups, paper, clothes, cigarette butts, window panes, etc., These different surfaces also contribute to the viability of their identification. However, though the wrinkles and grooves on labial mucosa can be instrumental in identifying a suspect thus verifying the presence or absence of a suspect at the scene of crime, still biologic evidence is of greater weightage in such cases. Unfortunately, frequently, the quality of lip print is very poor; either it is very vague or blurred, which makes for an impossible cheiloscopic identification, even under a magnifying lens. In recent years, lipsticks have been developed that do not leave any visible trace after contact with surfaces such as clothing, tissue paper, ceramic, and glass. These are the latent lip prints which can be developed with fingerprint powders such as black powder, gray powder and even lysochrome dyes such as Sudan III and Sudan black. Research studies have proved that DNA can not only be successfully isolated but also can be typed for short tandem repeat (STR) loci from the fingerprints.,, Thus, if DNA is extracted and analyzed for the full genetic profile of the suspect, it is considered as the final proof in the court of law. Methods of extracting DNA from different biological materials such as bloodstains and semen include separation and purification steps utilizing phenol–chloroform extractions and/or ethanol precipitation., The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method of amplifying small quantities of relatively short target sequences of DNA using sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers and thermostable Taq DNA polymerase. PCR requires only the target sequence to be intact, therefore amplifying even partially degraded and/or denatured DNA. Hence, PCR is extremely successful for the analysis of forensic casework samples, in which the quantity of DNA may be less than optimal for genetic profile analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to ascertain whether DNA can be extracted from the chemically processed latent lip prints as well as lipstick-coated lip prints. In addition, this research aimed to confirm whether DNA was of sufficient quality and quantity that can be amplified for genetic profiling of the suspect. In such instances, lip prints can be used as a biological evidence in the criminal courts. The objective of the study was to extract DNA and then to amplify the isolated DNA for typing of full STR loci (15 loci) to establish genetic profile of the individual on various surfaces using buccal sample as the control.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Our research was an institutional prospective study completed within a short span of 1 month. Individuals having lesions, swelling, or any pathoses on the lips were excluded from the study. An agreement for the usage of lip prints for DNA extraction and genetic profile analysis was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects of Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, and the study was conducted in accordance with its ethical standards. Consent forms were duly signed by the volunteers participating in the study, which emphasized the educational and research purposes of our project.
For the chemical processing of the invisible or latent lip prints, the same technique and armamentarium are used as for the fingerprints development in the field of forensic and legal medicine. In the present study, we used fingerprint feather brushes and fingerprint black powder (both from JK Consultancy Forensic Products Pvt. Ltd. ISO 9001: 2008 Government Certified Organisation) to develop the lip prints on different surfaces. The purpose was to use both porous surfaces (tissue paper and cloth fabric) and nonporous ones (ceramic tile and glass surface) for lip print impressions, thus assessing the quantity of DNA extracted from a variety of surfaces. For the lipstick-coated lip impressions, dark-brown-colored lipstick (extra-lasting lipstick, Avon Cosmetics India Limited, India) was used. All through the chemical processing of the latent lip prints, protective equipment such as gloves and facemask were used.
Latent lip prints were imprinted by the subject on paper handkerchiefs; cloth surface, transparent glass, and ceramic tile which were later (within 24 h) developed using fingerprint black powder. Long-lasting lipstick was applied on the volunteer with a lip brush, and then after waiting for 5 min, the volunteer was asked to make lip impressions by making sustained pressure for about 3 seconds on different supporting items. On each supporting surface, at least three impressions were made by the same individual. These lip prints were made visible using fingerprint black powder by carefully applying a small quantity of powder on the surface to locate the latent lip print. The best lip prints were selected to be processed for DNA extraction.
Finally, the tissue paper and cloth piece carrying the lip impressions were cut into very small pieces. Approximately, 3-mm side squares were cut out from all prints to attempt DNA extraction using the routine organic method (phenol-chloroform method), using DNA extraction kit from Identifiler ™ kit (AmpFLSTR ® Identifiler ® PCR Amplification Kit, Applied Biosystems, USA). Buccal sample was collected from the subject using a cotton swab, which was kept as a control. The buccal swab was selected as the control which helped in confirming the genetic profiling of the lip prints. In case of lip prints on ceramic and glass surfaces, two methods were used to procure lip prints so as to enable them to be subjected for DNA analysis. In the first method, a cotton swab was used to lift the DNA remains directly from the surface and then it was processed for DNA analysis. Furthermore, adhesive surface of the cellotape was pressed firmly on the ceramic and glass surfaces several times, thus imprinting lip impression on the adhesive side. This cello tape was then cut into very small pieces which were processed to attempt DNA isolation. Thus, in all, 12 samples were used to type the STR loci.
The amount and quality of DNA obtained were determined (Eppendorf Biophotometer ® D30 Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) to ascertain whether sufficient quantity of DNA was extracted which could be subjected for genetic profiling or STR loci of the individual.
The extracted DNA from various surfaces was amplified using the kit from Identifiler ™ kit (AmpFLSTR ® Identifiler ® PCR Amplification Kit, Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR was carried out in an Eppendorf Mastercycler for the typing of the following STR markers: D8S1179, D21511, D7S820, CSFIPO, D3S1358, TH01, D135317, D16S539, D251338, D195433, vWA, TPOX, D18S51, D5S818, and FGA. The PCR-amplified products obtained were subjected to electrophoresis separation and amplified alleles were run on 4% denatured polyacrylamide gels and then visualized using silver staining.
| Results|| |
In the present study, ample quantity of DNA was obtained from all the lip print samples, i.e., on all the surfaces whether porous ones such as cloth and tissue paper or nonporous ones such as ceramic tile and glass surface. Both swab technique and cellotape method showed sufficient quantity of DNA, and of 15 STR loci, most of the alleles were located successfully on all the 12 samples taken on different surfaces and matched the profile of the buccal swab taken as the control [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Thus, the full genetic profile of the individual was successfully established from the lip impressions. The average quantity of DNA from all the samples ranged between 15 and 21 ng/µL. The minimum DNA for amplification recommended is 5 ng.
|Table 1: Alleles for short tandem repeat loci on porous surfaces (tissue paper and cloth fabric) of the subject|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Alleles for short tandem repeat loci on nonporous surfaces (glass surface and ceramic tile) of the subject|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Diligent research work on cheiloscopy has ascertained that lip prints can be established as a means of evidence in the court of law and it is certainly possible to analyze these lip prints analogous to fingerprints.,,, Tsuchihashi  has classified them into six types for convenience, namely, vertical, incomplete vertical, branched, intersected, reticular, and indeterminate. Furthermore, the lip prints are unique, thus can be used as a potential source of investigation. However, sometimes, substantial forensic evidence is required to prove the individual identity in criminal cases. Undoubtedly, the full genetic profile of a person is the most reliable and foolproof evidence in the criminal courts. The present research is innovative as it successfully proves that it is not only possible to extract ample amount of DNA from the lip prints similar to the extraction from the fingerprints, but also possible to obtain a full STR profile of the individual. Using chemicals to develop the latent lip prints does not hinder the isolation of DNA. Similarly, the application of lipstick also does not, in any way, obstruct the extraction of DNA. The study also establishes that it is certainly feasible to extract DNA from porous as well as nonporous surfaces such as cups, glasses, and tissue paper which are most likely to be imprinted by the suspects in offensive cases. As per our literature search, only one similar study has been done so far on lip prints. However, researchers only used tissue paper as the surface and only three STR loci were typed. The present research successfully located 15 STR loci on different supporting surfaces. The source of DNA from the lip prints is the saliva and the shredded skin epithelial cells. A minimum amount of 5 ng/µL of DNA must be extracted to amplify it for obtaining a full genetic profile.
Only small amounts of even badly degraded DNA may be sufficient for forensic use. STR typing methods are widely used today for human identity testing applications including forensic DNA analysis. They express a high degree of polymorphism, making them of particular use to the forensic scientist. Thousands of STR markers, only a small subset, core set of loci have been selected for use in forensic DNA and human identity testing.,
Nevertheless, the limitations of the study are that the lip prints used were of fresh lip impressions with a maximum of 24 hours- time overlap. In real circumstances, the forensic investigator faces challenges such as environmental pollution and poor conservation. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of fingerprint powder in developing these prints even after a gap of 30 days without any protection under environmental conditions., This means of investigation should be relied on only when the conventional methods such as fingerprint or lip print development are unsuccessful. Furthermore, this evidence becomes vital and significant when DNA databases are available, and at a later point in the investigation, a suspect is developed. This study was an attempt to extract DNA from the lip prints, which was not only successfully located but also typed for 15 STR loci.
| Conclusion|| |
The possibility of extraction of DNA from lip impressions makes these lip traces more successful and useful to a forensic investigator. This proves that the lip prints are not only physical evidence but also biological evidence in the court of law and their significance certainly cannot be underestimated. The forensic fraternity can certainly rely on it as a substantial evidence if traditional methods such as fingerprint impressions fail or no other sources of evidence such as blood and saliva are present at the crime scene. Such breakthroughs surely will help the criminal justice system in arriving at faster and trustworthy conclusion.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Sivapathasundharam B, Ajayprakash P, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (Cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;10:234-7.
Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1-9.
Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24-7.
Sandhu SV, Bansal H, Monga P, Bhandari R. Study of lip print pattern in a Punjabi population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:24-8.
Kaul R, Padmashree SM, Shilpa PS, Sultana N, Bhat S. Cheiloscopic patterns in Indian population and their efficacy in sex determination: A randomized cross-sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:101-6.
Snlekha N, Anuradha A, Srinivas GV, Devi RS. Correlation among lip print pattern, fingerprint pattern and abo blood group. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:49-51.
Alvarez Segui M, Miquel Feucht M, Castello Ponce A, Verdu Pascual F. Persistent lipsticks and their lip prints: New hidden evidence at the crime scene. Forensic Sci Int 2000;112:41-7.
Zamir A, Springer E, Glattstein B. Fingerprints and DNA: STR typing of DNA extracted from adhesive tape after processing for fingerprints. J Forensic Sci 2000;45:687-8.
van Oorschot RA, Jones MK. DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature 1997;387:767.
Schulz MM, Reichert W. Archived or directly swabbed latent fingerprints as a DNA source for STR typing. Forensic Sci Int 2002;127:128-30.
Torre C, Gino S. Epidermal cells on stubs used for detection of GSR with SEM-EDX: Analysis of DNA polymorphisms. J Forensic Sci 1996;41:658-9.
Budowle B, Baechtel FS. Modifications to improve the effectiveness of restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. Appl Theor Electrophor 1990;1:181-7.
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 1982. 4th
ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2012.
Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chele×100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 1991;10:506-13.
Applied Biosystems Life Technologies Corporation. AmpFLSTR ®
PCR Amplification Kit User Guide. Minitab, Inc. Available from: https://www3.applied biosystems.com
. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug].
Lorente JA, Lorente M, Budowle B, Wilson MR, Villanueva E. Analysis of short tandem repeat (STR) HUMVWA in the Spanish population. Forensic Sci Int 1994;65:169-75.
Lorente M, Entrala C, Lorente JA, Alvarez JC, Villanueva E, Budowle B. Dandruff as a potential source of DNA in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 1998;43:901-2.
Acharya AB, Sivapathasundharam B. Forensic Odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, editors. Shafer's Textbook of Oral Pathology. 6th
ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2006. p. 1199-227.
Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci Int 1974;3:233-48.
Castelló A, Alvarez M, Verdú F. Just lip prints? No: There could be something else. FASEB J 2004;18:615-6.
Butler JM. Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:253-65.
Gill P. Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK – Past, present, and future perspectives. Biotechniques 2002;32:366-8, 370, 372.
Sharma P, Sharma N, Aggarwal P. Latent lip prints: How far a link to the suspect? European J Forensic Sci 2015;2:10-4.
[Table 1], [Table 2]