Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
IAFO CONFERENCE 2018 GOA - http://iafo2018goa.com/ Users Online: 376 
Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
  Home | About JFDS | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Online submission | Contact us | Advertise | Login 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46  

Sex determination efficacy of Papanicolaou and acriflavine Schiff stains in buccal smears


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Annoor Dental College, Ernakulam, Kerala, India

Date of Web Publication18-May-2017

Correspondence Address:
Tibin Kaithappillil Baby
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.206480

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Barr body is formed from random inactivation and condensation of one of the two female chromosomes in virtually all the somatic cells of female mammals. Buccal smears have been reported to be potential sources of Barr bodies. Aim: This study was done to assess the efficacy of acriflavine (AF) Schiff and Papanicolaou (PAP) stains in sex determination by identifying Barr bodies in buccal smears of both sexes. Materials and Methods: Two samples of buccal smears, collected from thirty males and thirty females in the age group of 16–60 years were used to demonstrate Barr bodies using AF Schiff and PAP stains, respectively. Hundred cells were examined for Barr body positive nucleus, and its mean percentage was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results: In females, AF Schiff stained positive cells ranged from 16% to 53% and PAP stained positive cells ranged from 9% to 38%. In males, 0–9% AF positive Barr bodies and 0–5% PAP stained Barr bodies were identified. Conclusion: Sex determination using buccal smear is a simple and reliable method. AF Schiff stain is better both qualitatively and quantitatively when compared to PAP stain, thus aids in more accurate sex determination.

Keywords: Acriflavine, Barr body, buccal smear, Papanicolaou, sex determination


How to cite this article:
Baby TK, Thomas P, Palani J, Pillai RK, Ramakrishnan BP. Sex determination efficacy of Papanicolaou and acriflavine Schiff stains in buccal smears. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:46

How to cite this URL:
Baby TK, Thomas P, Palani J, Pillai RK, Ramakrishnan BP. Sex determination efficacy of Papanicolaou and acriflavine Schiff stains in buccal smears. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 16];9:46. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2017/9/1/46/206480


   Introduction Top


Sex determination forms an important aspect in the forensic investigation of assault, theft, and sexual offences to identify the culprit. In cases of sexual offences, buccal mucosal cells along with saliva stains are found in various parts of the body and at the scene of the crime. Buccal smears help in detecting the gender and identifying the person in train and aircraft accidents, natural disasters and in cases with decomposed primary sex organs. Gender determination of living person is required in doubtful cases like in sports, with altered physical and sexual features and to decide certain civil rights reserved for one sex.[1]

Sex determination can be done by karyotyping, polymerase chain reaction, fluorescent body (Y chromatin) demonstration in male somatic cells, Davidson body in female neutrophils, and Barr body in female somatic cells.[1] Barr body is formed from random inactivation and condensation of one of the two female chromosomes in virtually all the somatic cells of female mammals and was named after Barr and Bertram in 1949.[2] It appears as a facultative heterochromatic dark-stained peripheral nuclear structure visible during interphase in normal female somatic cells.[3]

Barr bodies can be demonstrated from buccal smears, vaginal smears, hair root, and skin biopsy. Studies have proven to recognize sex from buccal scrapes and hair up to 4 months with decreasing frequencies under the dried condition, but both the X chromatin and Y chromatin disappeared in 6 hours under wet conditions.[4],[5],[6],[7]

Though many stains are used in identifying Barr bodies, only one study is reported in the literature using acriflavine (AF) Schiff on buccal smears.[4] A comparative study using Papanicolaou (PAP) and AF Schiff stains for Barr body identification is not yet reported. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficiency and reliability of PAP and AF Schiff stains in sex determination by identifying Barr bodies in buccal smears of both sexes.


   Materials and Methods Top


Sample collection and preparation

The present study has been reviewed by the Institutional Ethical Committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. A total of thirty men and thirty women in the age group of 16–60 years were selected randomly for the study. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. The participants were first asked to rinse the mouth with water. Two buccal mucosal smears were collected from every participant by scraping with a clean flat wooden spatula after labelling the slide. The slides were air dried and fixed in 95% isopropyl alcohol for 30 min before staining.

Staining method

Acriflavine Schiff staining method

Following washing in running tap water for few seconds, the samples were hydrolyzed in preheated 1N hydrochloric acid at 60°C for 5 min. After washing in distilled water for few seconds, the slides treated with freshly prepared fluorescent Schiff-type reagents (AF hydrochloride 0.1 g dissolved in 100 ml 90% isopropyl alcohol) for 20 min, washed twice in acid alcohol (12N hydrochloric acid 1 ml and 70% ethyl alcohol 100 ml) for 1 min, and dehydrated in absolute alcohol.[4],[8]

Papanicolaou staining method

The samples were stained in Harris's hematoxylin after rehydration, followed by dehydration in isopropyl alcohol and stained in OG 6 for 2 min. After rinsing in 95% isopropyl alcohol twice for 2 min each, they are stained in EA 50 for 3 min followed by rinse in 95% isopropyl alcohol for 1 minute.[9]

Barr body count

Cells with the intact nuclear membrane, without any crenation or depression, and the chromatins without clumps were selected and counted. The frequency of Barr body was examined by observing 100 nuclei per specimen under oil immersion. The Barr bodies that were found directly inside and attaching to the nuclear membrane were regarded as positive. PAP-stained Barr bodies were found as dark violet spot using research microscope (Lawrence and Mayo) and AF-stained Barr body appeared as bright greenish yellow spot using a fluorescence microscope (Lawrence and Mayo). The mean and standard deviation were determined for the percentage of Barr-body-positive cells in both the genders. Statistical analysis was done using the statistical software SPSS software version 16.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA) and P< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


   Results Top


Both in PAP and AF stained samples, females showed statistically significant increase in Barr bodies than males. Compared to PAP, AF staining showed more number of Barr bodies in both females and males [Table 1]. No correlation was found between the percentage of Barr-body-positive cells and the age of the individual in both males and females.
Table 1: Barr body positive cells in males and females using Papanicolaou and acriflavine Schiff stains

Click here to view


In females, all the samples showed Barr bodies in the nucleus using AF stain and PAP stain. The frequencies of Barr bodies were 16–53% using AF stain and 9–38% using PAP stain [Table 1] and [Figure 1], [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Barr body in the buccal smear of a female (Papanicolaou stain, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Barr body in the buccal smear of a female (Acriflavine stain, ×100)

Click here to view


In males, 86% showed the presence of Barr bodies using AF stain and the range was 0–9%, while 60% showed Barr bodies using PAP stain with a range of 0–6% [Table 1] and [Figure 3], [Figure 4].
Figure 3: Barr body in the buccal smear of a male (Papanicolaou stain, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Barr body in the buccal smear of a male (Acriflavine stain, ×100)

Click here to view


The positive and negative predictive values for the detection of Barr bodies using AF stain were calculated as 53% and 100%, respectively.


   Discussion Top


The buccal smear technique to identify sex was first introduced by Moore and Barr in 1955. The process of inactivation of X chromatin is known as lyonization, the process named after the scientist Lyon. In 1961, Lyon outlined the X-inactivation, also known as the Lyon hypothesis. It states that only one of the X chromosomes is genetically active in females while the other X of either maternal or paternal origin undergoes random heteropyknosis and is inactive. This occurs at among all the cells of the blastocyst in females on or about the 16th day of embryonic life. Inactivation of the same X chromosome persists in all the cells derived from each precursor cell. Thus, normal women are in reality mosaics and have two populations of cells, one with an inactivated maternal X and the other with an inactivated paternal X.[10]

The positivity for Barr bodies in males is due to the inheritance of males to carry primary sex organs of both the sexes. The process of inactivation is incompletely understood, but it has been suggested that it is under the control of inactivation center, located at Xq13. XIST, a gene which is transcribed from the inactive X, is necessary for initiation and propagation of X inactivation and does so by coating the inactive X. As inactive X is turned off by XIST allele, up to 21% of genes on Xp, and 3% on Xq may escape X inactivation.[11]

The frequency of Barr body is decreased during pregnancy, as well as in women on oral contraceptives.[12] Low frequency of Barr body was observed in newborn females and their mothers on the 1st postpartum day increased gradually on the 2nd and 3rd day, which stabilized on the 5th day and became similar in both mothers and the children.[13] Reactivation of X chromosome was observed whenever the body was under physiological stress.[14] Low frequency suggestive of reactivation of inactive X chromosome is associated with malignancy and is confirmed by enhanced glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity.[15],[16],[17],[18] Barr bodies appear as basophilic structures with varying morphology which can be spherical, rectangular, planoconvex, biconvex, or triangular measuring around 0.8 × 1.1 microns. In electron microscopy, it resembles various alphabetical letters such as V, W, S, or X.[19],[20]

Since Barr bodies are present within the nuclear material, special stains for nucleus such as PAP stain, feulgen and guard stain, orcein, hematoxylin and eosin, cresyl violet, carbol fuchsin, and fluorescent stains are used to visualize them. Methods which stain the chromatin deeply and trace the cytoplasm and the nucleoli are considered superior. Feulgen stain requires hydrochloric acid hydrolysis before the actual staining, and it has the advantage that Barr body will not be confused with other structures as in buccal smear contaminated with microorganisms. AF Schiff (3, 6- diamino-lO-methyl acridine) is one of the most interesting stains for Barr body demonstration because of its fluorescence properties.[21] The spectral characteristics (yellow fluorescence emission at blue excitation) and the very high quantum efficiency of the fluorescence have led to an extensive use of this fluorescence technique.[22],[23]

The main objective of the present study was to assess efficiency and reliability of AF Schiff and PAP stains in sex determination by identifying Barr bodies in buccal smears of both sexes. There are several methods for fluorescence staining of X chromatin including acridine orange, acridine yellow, AF, auramine O, and coriphosphine O. The fluorescence of these stain preparations disappears in a short period except AF hydrochloride which proved to retain fluorescence the longest.[7] In this study, we have seen that fluorescence using AF Schiff stain was retained for 4 days when kept covered. After the feulgen reaction, the X chromatin bodies were successfully stained as bright fluorescent greenish yellow spots directly inside the nuclear membrane.

In the present study, there is a difference in the range and the mean percentage of Barr bodies among women when compared to other studies. Nagamori and Takeda found a significant difference in the number of Barr bodies between male and female hair samples using AF. The frequency ranged from 27% to 70% (average 45.8%) in female samples and 0–8% (average 2.9%) in male samples.[7] Nagamori et al. detected Barr bodies in both buccal smears and hair cortex using AF Schiff stain and found that in female samples the frequencies were 58–87% (71.3% in average) in the cells of buccal mucosa and 59–85% (67.1% in average) in the nuclei of the hair cortex. The frequencies were 0–4% (1.2% in average) in the nuclei of buccal mucosa and 0–5% (1.3% in average) in the nuclei of the hair cortex for male samples.[4]

Mittal et al. demonstrated Barr bodies in the buccal mucosal cells of 1.1% of males and 39.2% of females using PAP stain.[1] A Nigerian study in 2012 showed that Barr body positivity in female buccal smears were 25% with cresyl fast violet, 33% with aceto-orcein (AO) and 40% with a combination of stains.[24] A study using AO and PAP stain on buccal smears showed that percentage of Barr bodies in AO stained slides ranged from 5% to 32% among females and from 0% to 8% in males, while with PAP stain the percentage was 4–20% in females and 0–5% in males.[25] Another study using acridine orange demonstrated a high range of Barr-body-positive mucosal cells (18–72%) in females compared to males (0–3%) under confocal microscopy.[26]

Using PAP stain, Barr bodies were not as distinct as with AF stain. Unlike PAP, AF did not stain inflammatory cells and fungi. PAP stain was retained for many days compared to AF stain. In our study, both AF and PAP stained samples were read without mounting. Optimum hydrolysis time is essential for feulgen reaction and standardization of hydrolysis time is crucial for AF stain. Initially, Nagamori's method of conventional stain preparation was tried, but improved AF stain preparation was found to be better. This method offered the following advantages: (a) simplified the preparation of the AF-feulgen reagent (b) the cytoplasm was less stained while the nuclei stained bright green (c) eliminated poorly defined reagents from the staining solutions.[8]

The results of this experiment demonstrated that the frequencies of Barr body are distinguishable between the male and female samples in buccal mucosal scrapes. The frequencies of Barr body in both sexes showed discrete distributions. After reviewing literature and from the present study, it is clear that Barr body count varies with different stains and with the same stain in different studies. This could be due to sample size variation, microscopy variation, cell selection bias, or the presence of microorganisms.


   Conclusion Top


Identifying Barr bodies in the buccal cells is a simple method of gender determination. AF proved to be a better and more specific stain than PAP for visualizing nuclear details as it stains only after feulgen reaction and its staining method was remarkably simple. This stain demonstrates more specificity in sex determination compared to PAP stain.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Mittal T, Saralaya KM, Kuruvilla A, Achary C. Sex determination from buccal mucosa scrapes. Int J Legal Med 2009;123: 437-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Barr ML, Bertram EG. A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female, and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 1949; 163: 676.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Caspersson T, Zech L, Modest EJ, Foley GE, Wagh U, Simonsson E.DNA- binding flourochromes for the study of the organization of the metaphase nucleus. Exp Cell Res. 1969;58:141-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nagamori H, Ohno Y, Uchima E, Kajiwara M, Nakazato M, Une Y, et al. Sex determination from buccal mucosa and hair root by the combined treatment of quinacrine staining and the fluorescent feulgen reaction using a single specimen. Forensic Sci Int 1986;31:119-28.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nagamori H. Sex determination from plucked human hairs without epithelial root sheath. Forensic Sci Int 1978;12:167-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nagamori H, Takeda K. Sex determination from plucked human hairs without epithelial root sheath. II. Depigmentation of melanin in the hair cortex before feulgen reaction. Forensic Sci Int 1980;15:169-75.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Nagamori H, Takeda K. Sex determination from plucked human hairs without epithelial root sheath. III. Fluorescent feulgen reaction using acriflavine. Forensic Sci Int 1981;17:85-90.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Levinson JW, Retzel S, McCormick JJ. An improved acriflavine-feulgen method. J Histochem Cytochem 1977;25:355-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bancroft JD. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 6th ed. Churchill-Livingstone, London, UK; 2008. p. 127-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lyon MF. Lyonisation of the X chromosome. Lancet 1963;2:1120-1.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lyon MF. X-chromosome inactivation spreads itself: Effects in autosomes. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:17-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Chakravarty A, Purandare H, Mehta L, Chakravarty BP. Effect of synthetic and natural sex steroids on X-chromatin. Indian J Med Res 1978;68:785-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Roy S, Das AK, Khare VN, Roy B. Frequency of sex chromatin in the buccal smear of newborn females and their mothers during first six days after delivery. Acta Cytol 1976;20:83-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Atkin NB. Symposium on Nuclear Sex. London, 1952; 68. Heinemann, London (1958).  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Camargo M, Wang N. Cytogenetic evidence for the absence of an inactivated X chromosome in a human female (XX) breast carcinoma cell line. Hum Genet 1980;55:81-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Smethurst M, Bishun NP, Fernandez D, Allen J, Burn JI, Alaghband-Zadeh J, et al. Steroid hormone receptors and sex chromatin frequency in breast cancer. J Endocrinol Invest 1981;4:455-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Therman E, Denniston C, Nieminen U, Buchler DA, Timonen S. X chromatin, endomitoses, and mitotic abnormalities in human cervical cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1985;16:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Straub DG, Lucas LA, McMahon NJ, Pellett OL, Teplitz RL. Apparent reversal of X-condensation mechanism in tumors of the female. Cancer Res 1969;29:1233-43.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hamerton J.L. Human Cytogenetics: Clinical Cytogenetics. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1971.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Moore KL. The sex chromatin. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1966.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Böhm N, Sprenger E. Fluorescence cytophotometry: A valuable method for the quantitative determination of nuclear feulgen-DNA. Histochemie 1968;16:100-18.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Cornelisse CJ, Ploem JS. A new type of two-color fluorescence staining for cytology specimens. J Histochem Cytochem 1976;24:73-81.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lerman LS. Structural considerations in the interaction of DNA and acridines. J Mol Biol 1961;3:18-30.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
G.I.N. Ndubuka. Aceto-orecin aceto-cresyl fast violet technique for the demonstration and enumeration of Barr bodies in buccal smears. Afr J Med Phy, Biomed Eng & Sc, 2012, 3, 52 – 57.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Datar U, Angadi PV, Hallikerimath S, Kale AD. Cytological assessment of Barr bodies using aceto-orcein and Papanicolaou stains in buccal mucosal smears and their sex estimation efficacy in an Indian sample. Acta Cytol 2013;57:516-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Reddy DS, Sherlin HJ, Ramani P, Prakash PA. Determination of sex by exfoliative cytology using acridine orange confocal microscopy: A short study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:66-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2030    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded159    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal