|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 56-60
Significance of mandibular canine index in sexual dimorphism and aid in personal identification in forensic odontology
Neha Gandhi1, Sandeep Jain2, Harkiranjot Kahlon1, Arshdeep Singh2, Ramandeep Singh Gambhir3, Akanksha Gaur4
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
3 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Rayat and Bahra Dental College and Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India
4 Department of General Dentistry, Private Practitioner, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
|Date of Web Publication||16-Nov-2017|
Ramandeep Singh Gambhir
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Rayat and Bahra Dental College and Hospital, Mohali - 140 104, Punjab
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Forensic odontology is basically the science dealing with establishing identity by teeth and has played an important, often crucial, role in the identification of victims of mass disasters. Among all teeth, the mandibular canines are found to exhibit greatest sexual dimorphism. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of mandibular canine index (MCI) in the determination of sex. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 62 subjects (31 males, 31 females). Mesiodistal diameter of mandibular canines was measured with the help of digital Vernier calipers. Intercanine distance was measured with the help of a divider. The standard MCI value is used as a cut off point to differentiate males from females. Statistical analysis was done using t-test. Results: The width of mandibular canine was higher in males than in females, which was statistically significant. The left canine is found to exhibit greater sexual dimorphism, i.e., 7.62% as compared with right canine, i.e., 6.85%. The calculated standard MCI for both male and female was 0.247. With these calculations, the overall percentage of sex determination was 79.03%. Conclusion: The ability to determine gender using Standard MCI was estimated to be 73.33% in males and 80% in females. It was concluded that with standard MCI, it was possible to detect sex for forensic purposes.
Keywords: Canine index, intercanine distance, mandibular canine, mesiodistal width, sexual dimorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Gandhi N, Jain S, Kahlon H, Singh A, Gambhir RS, Gaur A. Significance of mandibular canine index in sexual dimorphism and aid in personal identification in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:56-60
|How to cite this URL:|
Gandhi N, Jain S, Kahlon H, Singh A, Gambhir RS, Gaur A. Significance of mandibular canine index in sexual dimorphism and aid in personal identification in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 May 24];9:56-60. Available from: http://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2017/9/2/56/218570
| Introduction|| |
Teeth are an excellent material in living and nonliving populations for anthropological, genetic, odontologic, and forensic investigations. They serve as an invaluable tool for identification because of their durability in the face of fire and bacterial decomposition. Teeth are particularly useful in gender determination by utilizing different odontometrical techniques of real interest when bodies are often damaged beyond recognition during major disasters.
Odontometry has been performed on various tooth groups with the objective of establishing measurements that can act as standards. This information would assist some procedures in dental surgery and could also serve as an important tool in forensic odontology. Tooth size is of immense importance, not only to indicate the various activities related to occlusion or to determine the occurrence of dento-osseous anomalies applied to orthodontic treatment but also to establish sexual dimorphism.
Sexual dimorphism refers to the differences in size, stature, and appearance between male and female. This can be applied to dental identification also because no two mouths are alike. Various features such as tooth morphology and crown size are characteristics of male and female. In addition, a variety of factors influence tooth size due to which its morphometric study is a subject of great interest and gives significant results. According to Black, tooth size standards based on odontometric investigations can be used in age and sex determination. Whenever, it is possible to predict the sex, identification is simplified as missing persons belonging to only one gender are considered. In this sense, identification of sex takes precedence over age.
Mandibular canines are found to exhibit the greatest sexual dimorphism. The mean age of eruption of mandibular canines is 10.87 years, and they are the last teeth to be extracted with respect to age; therefore, they can be considered as the key teeth for personal identification. Hence, the present study was conducted to measure the mesiodistal diameter of both mandibular canines so as to establish canine measurement variations in sex determination and to evaluate the effectiveness of mandibular canine index (MCI) in gender identification.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Ethical clearance and informed consent
The present study was conducted in a private dental college and hospital in India after obtaining ethical clearance from the institutional authorities. The subjects were fully informed about the study undertaken and written informed consent was obtained. They were also assured that their unwillingness to participate in the study would not affect their treatment.
Study population and study sample
The study population consisted of new patients who were visiting dental hospital for availing some kind of dental treatment or for a routine dental checkup. The study comprised 62 subjects in the 15–25 years age group, of which 31 were males and 31 females. The subjects were included in the study on the basis of following criteria-age group between 15 and 30 years, having all fully erupted teeth with no spacing, periodontally healthy teeth, noncarious and nonattrited teeth, diastema or crowding and subjects with no clinical evidence of any restoration, orthodontic treatment, and trauma. The significant exclusion criteria for selection of the study sample were the presence of partially erupted/ectopically erupted teeth, patients with dental/occlusal abnormalities, teeth showing physiologic or pathologic wear and tear and patients with deleterious oral habits (like bruxism).
Mesiodistal width measurement
The subjects were seated on a dental chair, and mandibular impressions with Alginate impression material (Cavex CA 37 Alginate, Holland) were made. Thereafter, impressions were poured with dental stone and study models were fabricated. The mean values of the mesiodistal width of the left and the right mandibular canines in males and females were obtained by measurement on stone models. Mesiodistal diameter of mandibular canines was measured with the help of digital Vernier calipers (Mitutoyo, Japan) accurate to 0.01 mm at the maximum mesiodistal width between the contact points of teeth on either side of cast. The mesial and distal surfaces of the teeth were identified, and the distance between the crest of curvature on the mesial surface and crest of curvature on the distal surface was recorded by the divider points (in case of difficulty in placing digital Vernier caliper). The divider was then held against the Vernier caliper and reading was noted [Figure 1]. Each reading was taken 3 times, and the average of three values was obtained to minimize the intraobserver error.
Intercanine distance measurement
Intercanine distance was measured between tips of both canines. The divider points were applied to the tips of the mandibular canines. The divider was then held against the Vernier caliper, and the reading was noted [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Measurement of intercanine distance on the study model with divider|
Click here to view
The observed MCI (MCIo) – it was calculated by dividing the mesiodistal width of the canine by the intercanine distance.
MCIo= Mesiodistal width of the canine/intercanine distance
The observed mandibular canine width and intercanine distance were subjected to statistical analysis to assess sex difference. The standard MCI value was used as a cut off point to differentiate males from females, which is obtained by applying following formula:
Standard MCI (MCIs) = (mean male MCI − SD) + (mean female MCI + SD)/2
Calculation of sexual dimorphism was done according to the formula given by Garn et al.
Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal width = Xm/Xf× 100
Xm = Mean value of canine width in males
Xf = Mean value of canine width in females.
The recorded data were transferred to a personal computer, and statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean value of the mandibular canine width in males and females on the right and left sides were compared using t-test. Standard deviation, variance, and t values were calculated for each parameter.
| Results|| |
[Table 1] shows sex-related differences among various parameters. When the mean value of intercanine distance of 62 subjects (31 males and 31 females) was compared, males showed higher values than females and the difference was statistically significant. The width of mandibular canine was higher in males than in females, which was statistically significant. Left canine is found to exhibit greater sexual dimorphism, i.e., 7.62% as compared with right canine, i.e., 6.85% [Table 2].
The ability to determine gender using Standard MCI was estimated to be 73.33% in males and 80% in females. The accuracy of the method, when applied to the combined data, was 76.66%.
The calculated standard MCI for both male and female was 0.247. With these calculations, the overall percentage of sex determination was 79.03%. On comparing the MCI values of this study to the standard MCI values of Rao et al. (0.274) and Muller et al. (0.269), the percentage of success of sex prediction was increased [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
It is a known fact that teeth provide excellent models for the study of the relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Individual identification is eased if sex is determined and it is of immense forensic importance. The present study is a sincere attempt to delineate the sexual variation in the morphology of permanent mandibular canines. It involved measurement of mesiodistal width, intercanine distance, and canine index. The study sample comprised patients attending a dental teaching hospital as individuals of different age groups are available at the same place and time.
The present study measured the mesiodistal width of the left and right mandibular canines in a comparable cohort of male and female subjects keeping other parameters which influence tooth size similar for both groups. The method analyzed in the present study is based on the measurement of the mandibular canines. The pattern of dimorphism of mandibular canines may have existed for millions of years but only during recent few decades, this pattern has been under close observation.
The mesiodistal dimensions of mandibular canines were comparable to those already reported in literature taking both genders together, the average being 6.9 mm in males and 6.5 mm in females.,,,, The mesiodistal dimensions also varied according to sex such that men's teeth were larger than those of women. These findings were in accordance with studies carried out by other authors.,,,,
We found left mandibular canine (7.62%) to be more dimorphic as compared to the right canine (6.85%). These findings were in accordance with the findings of Kaushal et al. and Nair et al. The sexual dimorphism is genetically controlled. “Y” chromosome which controls the thickness of dentine, intervenes most in the size of teeth as compared to “X” chromosome which has a greater influence on the thickness of enamel., The difference of mean mesiodistal width of mandibular canine of male and female was found to be statistically more significant for left mandibular canine than right mandibular canine. This indicates that mesiodistal width of left mandibular canine is a better parameter to differentiate male and female mandibular canines.
The mean intercanine distance was found to be similar to those found by Kaushal et al. Cassidy et al. analyzed the size and shape of the mandibular dental arches of 320 adolescents. They concluded that boys demonstrated larger arch dimensions as compared to girls, - a sex difference largely established before the onset of the adolescent growth spurt. Rao et al. demonstrated that intercanine distance and mandibular canine indices are useful parameters in differentiating the both the sexes. In the present study, right and left mandibular canine indices were found to be significantly different in males and females. This is in congruence with the findings observed by Kaushal et al.
On comparing the MCI values of this study to the standard MCIs values of Rao et al. (0.274) and Muller et al. (0.269), the overall percentage of sex determination was higher (79.03%). Any measurement of teeth unaccompanied by information about age, race, and sex must be interpreted with great caution. In the present study, sex could be predicted to the extent of about 79% under certain limitations due to variations of this parameter with geographic distribution. This implies the need for further studies to be performed with random and larger sample of the population from a particular geographical area to calculate standard MCI.
| Conclusion|| |
MCI is a quick and reliable method for sex identification when a standard for the population is available. The ability to determine gender using standard MCI was estimated to be 73.33% in males and 80% in females. Sex determination using the pelvis and skull bones shows the accuracy of 95% and above. As the accuracy of MCI in gender identification has never exceeded 87.5% in literature, it can only be used as a supplemental tool.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
William PL, Bannister LH, Dyson M, Berry MM, Collins P, Dussek JE, et al
. Gray's Anatomy; the teeth. 38th
ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Quatrehomme G, Bolla M. Odontometrical method useful in determining gender and dental alignment. Forensic Sci Int 2001;121:194-7.
Rai B, Anand SC, Bhardwaj DN, Dhattarwal SK. Gender determination from odontometry. Int J Dent Anthropol 2006;9:8-12.
Nagle RJ, Sears VH. Anterior tooth arrangement in complete dentures. 1st
ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1958. p. 353.
Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52:119-24.
Dayal PK, Srinivasan SV, Paravatty RP. Determination of sex using tooth. In: Textbook of Forensic Odontology. 1st
ed. Hyderabad: Paras Medical Publisher; 1998. p. 40.
Black GV. Description of human teeth. 4th
ed. Philadelphia S. S. White Mfg. Co.; 1902.
Parekh D, Zalawadia A, Ruparelia S, Patel S, Rathod SP, Patel SV. Study of mandibular canine teeth dimorphism in establishing sex identity in Gujarat region. NJIRM 2011;2:6-9.
Yuwanati M, Karia A, Yuwanati M. Canine tooth dimorphism: An adjunct for establishing sex identity. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:80-3.
] [Full text]
Khangura RK, Sircar K, Singh S, Rastogi V. Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:81-5.
] [Full text]
Vishwakarma N, Guha R. A study of sexual dimorphism in permanent mandibular canines and its implications in forensic investigations. Nepal Med Coll J 2011;13:96-9.
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning. Angle Orthod 1967;37:186-93.
Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular canine index – A clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int 1989;42:249-54.
Danielson K. Guest editorial. Int J Forensic Dent 1978;1:1-2.
Kapila R, Nagesh KS, R Iyengar A, Mehkri S. Sexual dimorphism in human mandibular canines: A radiomorphometric study in South Indian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2011;5:51-4.
Reddy VM, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of Western Uttar Pradesh. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2008;12:56-9. [Full text]
Galdames IS, López MC, Farías BL, Marchant CS, Muñoz ST, Rojas PG, et al
. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal and bucolingual tooth dimensions in Chilean people. Int J Morphol 2008;26:609-14.
Nair P, Rao BB, Annigeri RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Med Toxicol 1999;16:10-3.
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res 1967;46:963-72.
Cassidy KM, Harris EF, Tolley EA, Keim RG. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:445-54.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]