Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
Users Online: 59 
Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
  Home | About JFDS | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Online submission | Contact us | Advertise | Login 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 147-152  

Determination of epigenetic age through DNA methylation of NPTX2 gene using buccal scrapes: A pilot study


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission29-Apr-2019
Date of Decision15-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance08-Jan-2020
Date of Web Publication3-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nawal Khan
House No. 106, Lane 4, Umer Colony, Lal Nagar, Chanapora, Srinagar - 190 015, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_29_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Context: DNA methylation (DNAm) age can be used to evaluate the chronological age of individuals often called “epigenetic age.” In this study, buccal scrape samples were used for the determination of epigenetic age. Aims: To examine if epigenetic age could be determined using neuronal pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) gene in buccal cells. Setting and Design: This cohort study was designed to validate the use of buccal cells for epigenetic age estimation. Sanger sequencing was used to determine the genetic sequence of the gene of interest postamplification. Nucleotide base sequence for NPTX2 gene was obtained for each case using this protocol. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted on buccal scrapes obtained from 26 subjects of both genders, whose age varied from 1 to 65 years. The samples, collected by wooden spatulas, were placed in cell suspension buffer and stored at 4°C until transported to the laboratory. Results: Methylation levels of 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' located in the gene NPTX2 of 26 subjects were studied and analyzed by bisulfate sequencing. The percentage of methylation in this study falls in the range between 15% and 51%. Conclusion: In this study, a sufficient amount of gDNA was retrieved from the buccal cells, thus confirming that buccal scrape was a feasible technique to obtain ample DNA. This study also showed that DNAm-polymerase chain reaction method was a feasible method for the evaluation of methylation pattern of NPTX2 gene.

Keywords: Age determination, buccal scrape, DNA methylation, epigenomic age, forensic science


How to cite this article:
Khan N, Bavle RM, Makarla S, Konda P, Amulya S R, Hosthor SS. Determination of epigenetic age through DNA methylation of NPTX2 gene using buccal scrapes: A pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2019;11:147-52

How to cite this URL:
Khan N, Bavle RM, Makarla S, Konda P, Amulya S R, Hosthor SS. Determination of epigenetic age through DNA methylation of NPTX2 gene using buccal scrapes: A pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 26];11:147-52. Available from: https://www.jfds.org/text.asp?2019/11/3/147/285781




   Introduction Top


Age determination plays an important role in forensic medicine in the identification of bodies as well as in connection with crimes.[1] Forensic anthropology is continually evolving and expansion of the discipline, combined with rapidly improving technology, has seen an increase in the development of new as well as refinement of existing methods.[2]

DNA is present in the flakes of the skin, drops of blood, hair, and saliva that can be used to identify a human being. The study of forensics relies on these small bits of DNA to link criminals to the crimes they commit. With the help of DNA, the gender and age of a person in question can be determined.[3] DNA present in blood, hairbrush, clothes, cervical smear, or biopsy sample provides a good source. The extracted DNA can be analyzed by various methods such as restriction fragment length polymorphism, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and microarrays.[4]

The epigenetic landscape provides new perspectives for use as biomarkers with the development of experimental technologies mediated by high-throughput sequencing and genomic data mining. One of these epigenetic modifications, DNA methylation (DNAm), has been shown to closely correlate with age, that is, the global level of methylated genomic DNA decreases or increases as a person ages depending on the gene chosen for age determination.[5]

The estimation of human age is important in forensic science in cases of a crime investigation or a mass disaster.[6] Blood, saliva, and hair recovered at crime scenes help determine the owner's age.[7] Buccal cells can serve as a better substitute to collect DNA when blood and hair samples become difficult to obtain or are nonviable.[8]

Recent predictor of age is known as epigenetic or DNAm age.[9] Methylation patterns of neuronal pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) gene shows a progressive increase with age.[1] Our aim was to check if buccal cells were a viable source to calculate DNAm age and its correlation to chronological age.


   Subjects and Methods Top


The study was conducted on buccal scrapes obtained from healthy individuals aged 1–65 years and collected by the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, after obtaining appropriate ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee to carry out this study. The total number of subjects taken for the study was 26, i.e., 13 male and 13 female subjects with no history of oral habits such as smoking, tobacco chewing, or alcohol use. The age of these individuals varied from age group 1–5 years to 60–65 years. One male and one female subject were taken from each lustrum. The details of each subject were taken along with their chronological ages.

The subjects were briefed about the procedure, a brief history was noted down and informed consent was obtained from all the individuals. It was ensured that the person providing the sample had not consumed any food or drink for 30 min before sample collection. Sterile wooden spatulas were used for buccal scrape; the stick was scraped against the inside of each cheek about five times. To dispense the cells, the sample collected was put into cell suspension buffer taken in a centrifuge tube. The samples collected were stored at 4°C in a refrigerator until transported to the laboratory within 24 h of sample collection in a cooler.

For DNA analysis (in laboratory)

Once the samples were received in the laboratory, the collection tubes with buccal cells were centrifuged at room temperature for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. This step settled the buccal cells. After this, the supernatant was discarded and extraction of DNA with cell pellet was carried out.

The gDNA was extracted with the help of gDNA extraction kit. The gDNA of the samples is shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. After gDNA was extracted, it was stored at −20°C overnight. This was followed by bisulfite conversion of the samples. Bisulfite conversion is used to deaminate unmethylated cytosine to produce uracil in DNA and is considered the “gold standard” for downstream applications to assess DNAm status. Methylated cytosines are protected from the conversion to uracil, allowing the use of direct sequencing to determine the locations of unmethylated cytosines and 5-methylcytosine at single-nucleotide resolution.
Figure 1: Genomic DNA extracted from 16 buccal samples loaded on 1% agarose gel

Click here to view
Figure 2: Reextraction of genomic DNA from 9 buccal samples loaded on 1% agarose gel

Click here to view


Before the direct PCR sequencing, purification of PCR products is necessary to remove the residue of the PCR reaction that might interfere with the outcome of sequencing results. Chromous gel extraction kit was used for the purification of PCR products. DNA obtained was purified DNA and it was then sent for PCR without any precipitation step.

Sanger sequencing was done for the bisulfite-converted samples. PCR amplicons (for NPTX2 region) were used for sequencing. Routine PCR was carried out consisting of a series of 35 repeated temperature changes, called cycles, with each cycle commonly consisting of three discrete temperature changes. One of the exon regions (Exon 1) that had been previously shown to be hypermethylated with aging was studied. After the PCR amplification, the sequence data showing nucleotide base sequence for the NPTX2 region for each case were obtained. The methylation pattern for the region under study was also analyzed. The bisulfite conversion pattern of each case obtained was then compared to the reference sequence. This was followed by bisulfite conversion and PCR amplification of the NPTX2 gene. PCR amplification of NPTX2 region from converted genomic DNA is shown in [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Polymerase chain reaction amplification of neuronal pentraxin 2 region from converted genomic DNA. The size of polymerase chain reaction-amplified product is ~ 500 bp

Click here to view


Once the PCR-amplified exon region of NPTX2 gene to be studied for each case was obtained, a reference sequence was obtained from a patent where the gene had been studied in relation to age changes. Based on the comparison of the number of methylated CpG islands in sample and reference sequence, the percentage of methylation for each case was calculated.

The reference sequence is given below:

The reference sequence




   Observations and Results Top


In this study, methylation status of 60 CpG islands of NPTX2 gene was investigated. The number of sites that were completely methylated was calculated after conversion and compared to the reference sequence. The number of CpG in query sequence postconversion in all cases ranged between 9 and 31.

For each of the 26 cases, the subject sequence was compared to the reference sequence. The fluorogram for the NPTX2 gene sequence for one case is given in [Figure 4]. Similarly, observations for each case were recorded.
Figure 4: Fluorogram of raw sequences

Click here to view


Ample genomic DNA (approximately 2 μg) was obtained from buccal epithelial cells of all cases. After bisulfite conversion was done for all samples, purification of PCR products was done which is necessary to remove the residue of the PCR reaction that might interfere with the outcome of sequencing results. DNA obtained was then sent for PCR, followed by Sanger sequencing which helped in obtaining the data for all cases. After the PCR amplification, the sequence data showing nucleotide base sequence for the NPTX2 region for each case were obtained. The sequenced data obtained were compared to the reference sequence. Based on the comparison of the number of methylated CpG islands in sample and reference sequence, the percentage of methylation for each case was calculated. The percentage of methylation obtained was in the range of 15%–51%. Previous studies had shown an increase in the epigenetic difference with age, suggesting increased epigenetic drift. However, we were unable to replicate these methylation changes. The methylation pattern in this study was random, with some younger subjects showing more methylation percentage than older subjects.


   Discussion Top


Numerous studies have focused on the relationship of epigenome state and age, especially DNAm and chronological age. Heyn et al. in their study reported that centenarians exhibit lower DNAm levels. Their study also found that throughout the entire genome of centenarians compared to newborns, the correlation between neighbor CpGs is weaker. Horvath accurately predicted age based on DNAm and identified human biological age markers to institute what is known as an epigenetic clock.[9]

DNAm has shown a relationship with age; the overall level of methylated genomic DNA decreases as a person ages. According to some reports, some specific CpG sites, 5-methyldeoxycytidine (5 mC) modification increases with age, whereas at other CpG sites, 5 mC level decreases with age. Age prediction models with an average error of 2.9–5.2 years have been built using DNAm.[5]

The different organs that have been studied for the comparison of methylation changes with age include small intestine, lung, kidney, liver, spleen, whole blood, saliva, and buccal cells.[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]

ADAR, AQP11, ITGA2B, and PDE4C are the four genes that have shown relation to age; ten other reports have shown methylation of ITGA2B and PDE4C (cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4C) to be the age-associated marker by ADAR, a RNA editor.[5]

Whole blood leukocytes of different age populations have shown 9 DNAm genes (EXHX1, TSP50, GSTM1, SLC5A5, SPI1, F2R, LMO2, PTPN6, and FGFR2) to be associated with age. More than 15% decrease of the CG methylation was seen in four genes (TRIP6, ABCB4, ABCC2, and GML).[15]

Other genes that have been associated with age include MSX1, MYL5, MPG, ACTN3, NAGS, DYDC1-DYDC2, SCN4B, HYDIN, thiosulfate sulfurtransferase, LFT, CTSZ, EMP3, and NET1. Some other genes such as ANK1, HOXA9, TMEM61, ATP8A2, TEX264, and TINAGL1 may also show age-related methylation changes. Several CpG sites were involved in the classification of a wide range of ages. For example, the sites associated with NPTX2, CHRNB4, RAB42, and ESRP2 were reported as significant for all ages between 19 and 60 years.[16]

Other genes that have been shown to be associated with age include TBOX3, GPR137, ZIC4, ZDHHC22, MEIS1, UBE2E1, PTDSS2, and UBQLN1.[10]

A linear correlation of methylation of three sites of EDARADD, TOM1 L1, and NPTX2 genes was seen with age over a range of five decades. A regression model was able to predict the age of an individual with an average accuracy of 5.2 years. Among these genes, NPTX2 methylation status was shown to be linked with age in blood as well.[17]

Bocklandt et al. in their study of EDARADD gene showed a linear correlation with age over a 5-decade period by studying 88 sites in saliva samples.[4],[18]

Based on these published data, where NPTX2 gene was studied for its correlation with age, we decided to study this one age-related marker, using quantitative Sanger sequencing. We based the selection of our gene on shortlists published by various other research groups. Here, we examined a series of CpG sites, selected based on their overall rankings in multiple studies, for application of these loci for use as an age-specific epigenetic marker.

Several different assays are available for studying the DNAm of specific genes/regions. Bisulfite sequencing, the first step for many downstream methods, is considered to be the “gold standard” method in DNAm studies.[19]

We used the method of bisulfite treatment and PCR followed by sequencing based on the fact that it allows a quantitative analysis. Furthermore, this is not too tedious. The main benefit of bisulfite treatment for interrogating DNAm status is that the location of the 5-mC modification can be determined at single-nucleotide resolution, meaning that the precise cytosine residue that is methylated can be pinpointed.

In the present study, we studied the age-associated differences in DNA from the buccal epithelial cells of 26 individuals aged 1–65 years. The sample size in the previous studies done ranged between 44[20] and 80 years.[21] Genomic DNA was extracted from the buccal epithelial cells. Buccal cells have been previously used for studying DNAm changes with age as demonstrated from studies by Gustafson[12] van Dongen et al.,[22] and Kaminsky.[23] The bisulfite conversion of the extracted DNA was done followed by PCR treatment. This was followed by Sanger sequencing. This was done in accordance with the study done by Christensen et al.[24] and Silva et al.,[20] in which bisulfite modified DNA Sanger sequencing was performed. The gene that we studied was NPTX2, based on the fact that numerous other studies had studied its methylation pattern with age.[11],[16],[17],[18],[20] The same studies showed an increase in the percentage of methylation of this gene with age.[11],[16],[17],[18],[20] The percentage of hypermethylation was calculated manually. This was done in contrast to different studies that used software to do the same.[17],[20] Previous studies have shown an increase in the epigenetic differences with age, suggesting increased epigenetic drift.[11],[16],[17],[18],[20] We were unable to replicate these methylation changes.

The lack of epigenetic drift within this study contrasts with the previous studies done on NPTX2 gene. The main difference between the two studies is that we focused on the small sample size. Another important question related to age markers is how reproducible the results are when the analysis is done with different cell types. It has been noted that many age-associated DNAm changes are tissue specific. It was observed that a correlation between methylation values and age was found when analyzing both saliva and blood samples.[20] In this study, we used buccal cells and as such the difference in the composition of the samples can result in differences in their gene expression and as such change in methylation pattern should be expected.

The other reason can be the fact that only one gene (NPTX2) was studied in comparison to studies that have taken into consideration at least two genes.[18] The small number of loci of CpG islands being studied can be yet another reason. The NPTX2 gene studied has five exons – we had chosen to study one of these. The methylation changes in the gene might have been seen in other exons. This can be the reason why methylation changes with age could not be observed with age in our case.

As far as the technique used is concerned, bisulfite conversion can lead to DNA fragmentation, which makes amplification of long fragments difficult and can also result in the generation of chimeric products. To overcome the problem of unspecific amplification, nested PCR is often required. Amplification of long fragments from bisulfite-treated DNA is difficult. Another important point to be taken into consideration is to ensure complete conversion of nonmethylated cytosines. This is important as the estimated level of DNAm depends on it and as such it is necessary to incorporate controls for bisulfite reactions.[19]


   Conclusion Top


In this study, the buccal scrape samples from 26 individuals ranging from 1 to 65 years were evaluated. A sufficient amount of gDNA to study hypermethylation status of NPTX2 gene was retrieved from the samples. Thus, we could confirm that buccal scrape was a feasible technique to obtain ample DNA.

The gDNA was bisulfite treated followed by PCR amplification of NPTX2 gene followed by Sanger sequencing. This method helped obtain the sequence data for the NPTX2 gene. Thus, small samples of DNA (2 μg) obtained from epithelial buccal cells are ample for routine DNA analysis.

After Sanger sequencing, the sequenced data for NPTX2 gene were calculated. Based on the comparison of the number of methylated CpG islands in sample and reference sequence, the percentage of methylation for each case was obtained. This study showed that DNAm-PCR method was a feasible method for the evaluation of methylation pattern of NPTX2 gene.

In age-related DNAm studies, the challenges include (a) finding the more sensitive and specific mechanism that will provide results with better reproducibility and (b) to identify principal genes and loci for which methylation patterns can be observed. Further research needs to be conducted to determine the age-related methylation changes in genes associated with age and its ability to predict chronological age with more accuracy. In this regard, studying all exons/larger gene sequence/full gene sequence/promoter regions or multiple age related genes can be helpful.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:10604-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Johnson AA, Akman K, Calimport SR, Wuttke D, Stolzing A, de Magalhães JP. The role of DNA methylation in aging, rejuvenation, and age-related disease. Rejuvenation Res 2012;15:483-94.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Koch CM, Wagner W. Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging (Albany NY) 2011;3:1018-27.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, Sánchez FJ, Sinsheimer JS, Horvath S, et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS One 2011;6:e14821.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Maegawa S, Hinkal G, Kim HS, Shen L, Zhang L, Zhang J, et al. Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice. Genome Res 2010;20:332-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Alkass K, Buchholz BA, Ohtani S, Yamamoto T, Druid H, Spalding KL. Age estimation in forensic sciences: Application of combined aspartic acid racemization and radiocarbon analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010;9:1022-30.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Srettabunjong S, Satitsri S, Thongnoppakhun W, Tirawanchai N. The study on telomere length for age estimation in a Thai population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2014;35:148-53.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Küchler EC, Tannure PN, Falagan-Lotsch P, Lopes TS, Granjeiro JM, Amorim LM. Buccal cells DNA extraction to obtain high quality human genomic DNA suitable for polymorphism genotyping by PCR-RFLP and Real-Time PCR. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:467-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 2013;14:R115.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rakyan VK, Down TA, Maslau S, Andrew T, Yang TP, Beyan H, et al. Human aging-associated DNA hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains. Genome Res 2010;20:434-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fraser HB, Lam LL, Neumann SM, Kobor MS. Population-specificity of human DNA methylation. Genome Biol 2012;13:R8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41:45-54.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Norrgard K. Forensics, DNA Fingerprinting, and CODIS. Nature Education; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ramakrishnan K, Sharma S, Sreeja C, Pratima DB, Aesha I, Vijayabanu B. Sex determination in forensic odontology: A review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7:S398-402.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Xu C, Qu H, Wang G, Xie B, Shi Y, Yang Y, et al. A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model. Sci Rep 2015;5:17788.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wang Y, Zhang J, Xiao X, Liu H, Wang F, Li S, et al. The identification of age-associated cancer markers by an integrative analysis of dynamic DNA methylation changes. Sci Rep 2016;6:22722. [Doi: 10.1038/srep22722].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Yeh SH, Liu CL, Chang RC, Wu CC, Lin CH, Yang KD. Aging-dependent DNA hypermethylation and gene expression of GSTM1 involved in T cell differentiation. Oncotarget 2017;8:48591-602.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Torabi Moghadam B, Dabrowski M, Kaminska B, Grabherr MG, Komorowski J. Combinatorial identification of DNA methylation patterns over age in the human brain. BMC Bioinformatics 2016;17:393.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Yi SH, Xu LC, Mei K, Yang RZ, Huang D ×. Isolation and identification of age-related DNA methylation markers for forensic age-prediction. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2014;11:117-25.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bekaert B, Kamalandua A, Zapico SC, Van de Voorde W, Decorte R. Improved age determination of blood and teeth samples using a selected set of DNA methylation markers. Epigenetics 2015;10:922-30.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kurdyukov S, Bullock M. DNA methylation analysis: Choosing the right method. Biology (Basel) 2016;5. pii: E3.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
van Dongen J, Ehli EA, Slieker RC, Bartels M, Weber ZM, Davies GE, et al. Epigenetic variation in monozygotic twins: A genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in buccal cells. Genes (Basel) 2014;5:347-65.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kaminsky ZA, Tang T, Wang SC, Ptak C, Oh GH, Wong AH, et al. DNA methylation profiles in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Nat Genet 2009;41:240-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Christensen BC, Houseman EA, Marsit CJ, Zheng S, Wrensch MR, Wiemels JL, et al. Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000602.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
    Observations and...
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed519    
    Printed42    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal