Qualitative assessment of the dental groove pattern and its uniqueness for forensic identification

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 1, 2019
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_73_19
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 11, Issue 1, January-April 2019

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Jyotirmoy Roy
Laboratory of Forensic Odontology, Institute of Forensic Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
Muraleedharan Rohith
Laboratory of Forensic Odontology, Institute of Forensic Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
Debesh Nilendu
Laboratory of Forensic Odontology, Institute of Forensic Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
Abraham Johnson
Laboratory of Forensic Odontology, Institute of Forensic Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

Abstract

No Abstract.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jyotirmoy Roy, Muraleedharan Rohith, Debesh Nilendu, & Abraham Johnson. (2019). Qualitative assessment of the dental groove pattern and its uniqueness for forensic identification. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 11(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_73_19
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Puri PM, Khajuria H. Disaster victim identification (DVI) through dental evidence: Overview and challenges in Indian scenario. Int J Res Sci Innov 2015;2:54‑7.
  2. Kieser JA, van der Merwe CA. Classificatory reliability of the carabelli trait in man. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:795‑801.
  3. Divakar KP. Forensic odontology: The new dimension in dental analysis. Int J Biomed Sci 2017;13:1‑5.
  4. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental evidence in forensic identification – An overview, methodology and present status. Open Dent J 2015;9:250‑6.
  5. Disaster Victim Identification Team of the Bundeskryminalamt, Identifying victims of major incidents in Germany and abroad. Fachbereich KT11-IDKO, 65173 Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt; 2018.
  6. Horvath JE, Ramachandran GL, Fedrigo O, Nielsen WJ, Babbitt CC, St Clair EM, et al. Genetic comparisons yield insight into the evolution of enamel thickness during human evolution. J Hum Evol 2014;73:75‑87.
  7. Salido EC, Yen PH, Koprivnikar K, Yu LC, Shapiro LJ. The human enamel protein gene amelogenin is expressed from both the X and the Y chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 1992;50:303‑16.
  8. Lau EC, Slavkin HC, Snead ML. Analysis of human enamel genes: Insights into genetic disorders of enamel. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:121‑30.
  9. Gregory WK, Hellman M. Palaeontology of the human dentition Part I. The crown patterns of fossil and recent human molar teeth and their meaning. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr 1926;12:1027‑37.
  10. Jørgensen KD. The dryopithecus pattern in recent Danes and Dutchmen. J Dent Res 1955;34:195‑208.
  11. Irish JD. Terms and terminology used in dental anthropology. A Companion to Dental Anthropology. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2016. p. 85-93.
  12. Kullmer O, Benazzi S, Fiorenza L, Schulz D, Bacso S, Winzen O, et al. Technical note: Occlusal fingerprint analysis: Quantification of tooth wear pattern. Am J Phys Anthropol 2009;139:600‑5.
  13. Gouse S, Karnam S, Girish HC, Murgod S. Forensic photography: Prospect through the lens. J Forensic Dent Sci 2018;10:2‑4.
  14. Nanci A., editor. Ten Cate’s. Development of the tooth and its supporting tissues. In: Antonio Nancy. Ten Cate’s Oral histology, Development, structure, and function. 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2018. p. 210-15.
  15. Simmer JP, Papagerakis P, Smith CE, Fisher DC, Rountrey AN, Zheng L, et al. Regulation of dental enamel shape and hardness. J Dent Res 2010;89:1024‑38.
  16. Nair S, Kotrashetti VS, Nayak R, Hosmani J. Occlusal groove patterns and cusp number in permanent mandibular first and second molar among Indian population‑a pilot study. J Adv Clin Res Ins 2018;5:115.
  17. Ahsana A, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Evaluation of occlusal groove morphology of primary mandibular second molar in an Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2018;10:92‑5.
  18. Mosharraf R, Ebadian B, Ali Z, Najme A, Niloofar S, Leila K. Occlusal morphology of mandibular second molars in Iranian adolescents. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:16‑9.
  19. Phulari RG, Rathore R, Takvani MD, Jain S. Evaluation of occlusal groove patterns of mandibular first and second molars in an Indian population: A forensic anthropological study. Indian J Dent Res 2017;28:252‑5.
  20. Dholia B, Manjunatha BS. Occlusal morphology of permanent mandibular first and second molars in Gujarati population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:137‑41.
  21. Ramotowski R, editor. Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012