Antemortem dental records versus individual identification

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 1, 2018
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_13_18
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 10, Issue 3, September-December 2018

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Niveditha Thampan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
R Janani
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
R Ramya
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
R Bharanidharan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
A Kumar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
K Rajkumar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Abstract

Background: Forensic odontology plays a pivotal role in the identification of victims in mass disasters utilizing “preserved dental records” or “ante-mortem records” available with the general dental practitioners. Identification of a deceased individual by comparing antemortem and postmortem records is more reliable and easier as compared to other methods. However, in India, the practice of maintaining dental case record requires additional emphasis. Aim: The aim of the present study is to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of dental practitioners in South India regarding awareness and importance of maintaining patient's dental records. Settings and Design: A descriptive questionnaire study was conducted among the alumni of the dental institution over a period of 3 months. The alumni who passed out from 2000 to 2015 were included in the study. Materials and Methods: A structured questionnaire containing 24 questions regarding the knowledge, attitude, and practice of maintaining clinical case records was prepared and validated. Data were collected from 543 dental practitioners from various parts of South India who were the alumni of the dental institution. Statistical Analysis: The data were summarized and analyzed using the statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The descriptive analysis was done in percentages, and the results were tabulated. Results: Overall, 58.39% of dentists were found to be maintaining records promptly, and 84.6% dentists have knowledge about forensic odontology, but only 8.4% of dentists have helped the government agencies during mass disasters. Conclusion: This study reveals that the need of the hour is to change the attitude and to cultivate interest among practicing dentists regarding dental record maintenance which can tremendously help in the deceased individual identification process.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Niveditha Thampan, R Janani, R Ramya, R Bharanidharan, A Kumar, & K Rajkumar. (2018). Antemortem dental records versus individual identification. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_13_18
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Shanbhag VK. Significance of dental records in personal identification in forensic sciences. J Forensic Sci Med 2016;2:39‑43.
  2. Sahni A, Rehani S, Mathias Y, Kardam P, Nagpal R, Kumari R, et al. A questionnaire survey on forensic odontology: Are we really aware? J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8:113.
  3. Wadhwan V, Shetty DC, Jain A, Khanna KS, Gupta A. A call for a new speciality: Forensic odontology as a subject. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:97‑100.
  4. Sengupta S, Sharma V, Gupta V, Vij H, Vij R, Prabhat K, et al. Forensic odontology as a victim identification tool in mass disasters: A feasibility study in the Indian scenario. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:58‑61.
  5. Sarode GS, Sarode SC, Choudhary S, Patil S, Anand R, Vyas H, et al. Dental records of forensic odontological importance: Maintenance paĴ ern among dental practitioners of Pune city. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:48.
  6. Bublil N, Kahana T. Antemortem and postmortem nonapposite data – A multidisciplinary identifi cation strategy. J Forensic Sci 2015;60:501-4.
  7. Brown KA. Procedures for the collection of dental records for person identifi cation. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2007;25:63-4.
  8. Charangowda BK. Dental records: An overview. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:5-10.
  9. Waleed P, Baba F, Alsulami S, Tarakji B. Importance of dental records in forensic dental identifi cation. Acta Inform Med 2015;23:49-52.
  10. Ramesh G, Sant VK, Mishra G, Raj A, Sing S, Pathak S. Knowledge on record maintenance and its importance in forensic needs among dental practitioners of Kanpur city. Univ J Dent Sci 2015;3:25-9.
  11. Astekar M, Saawarn S, Ramesh G, Saawarn N. Maintaining dental records: Are we ready for forensic needs? J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:52-7.
  12. Gupta A, Mishra G, Bhutani H, Hoshing C, Bhalla A. Forensic revolution need maintenance of dental records of patients by the dentists: A descriptive study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6:316-20.
  13. Preethi S, Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B. Awareness of forensic odontology among dental practitioners in Chennai: A knowledge, aĴ itude, practice study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:63-6.
  14. Dierickx A, Seyler M, de Valck E, Wijff els J, Willems G. Dental records: A Belgium study. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2006;24:22-31.
  15. Al-Azri AR, Harford J, James H. Awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in Australia: Are they keeping forensically valuable dental records? Aust Dent J 2016;61:102-8.