Age estimation and comparison by dental and skeletal maturity in the age range of 9–18 years in the Mumbai region


Hemlata Pandey
Vandana Tripathi
Harish Pathak
Sumit Choudhary
Manoj Parchake


Background: Age estimation is crucial in the identification of juveniles in conflicts with law, survivor of sexual assault, sportsperson, and civil cases. Aims: To estimate and compare the age (9–18 years) by dental and skeletal maturity in the Mumbai region. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 cases from 9 to 18 years of age were studied in 1 year in the urban population of the Mumbai region. Among 70 cases, 45 were males and 25 were females. Orthopantomogram and elbow joint radiographs were taken to assess the dental age through modified Demirjian's method and the radiological age through Sangma et al. staging method, respectively. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics Version 26; descriptive statistics and regression statistics were used in the study. Results: Dental age by Demirjian's method in males with standard deviation was 15.25 (2.17), with a mean difference of 1.08 and significant P = 0.03. However, in females, dental age by Demirjian's method with standard deviation was 14.30 (1.94) with a mean difference of 0.74 and insignificant P = 0.07. Interclass correlation coefficient of dental age with chronological age, in males and females, showed 0.85 and 0.87 correlation, respectively. Correlation between the skeletal maturity and the dental age was reflected by the association of Demirjian stage 9 in the second molar with radiological stage 5 in males and stage 4 in females. Conclusions: It was concluded that Demirjian's method shows a significant correlation and P value for the age estimation in males of the Mumbai region.


How to Cite
Hemlata Pandey, Vandana Tripathi, Harish Pathak, Sumit Choudhary, & Manoj Parchake. (2019). Age estimation and comparison by dental and skeletal maturity in the age range of 9–18 years in the Mumbai region. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 11(3), 142–146.


  1. Chaillet N, Demirjian A. Dental maturity in South France: A comparison between Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:1059‑66.
  2. Acharya AB. Age estimation in Indians using Demirjian’s 8‑teeth method. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:124‑7.
  3. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211‑27.
  4. Sangma WB, Marak FK, Singh MS, Kharrubon B. A roentgenographic study for age determination in boys of North‑Eastern region of India. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2006;28:55‑9.
  5. Shilpa PH, Sunil RS, Sapna K, Kumar NC. Estimation and comparison of dental, skeletal and chronologic age in Bangalore South school going children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31:63‑8.
  6. Bagherian A, Sadeghi M. Assessment of dental maturity of children aged 3.5 to 13.5 years using the Demirjian method in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci 2011;53:37‑42.
  7. Hegde RJ, Sood PB. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: Radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:132‑8.
  8. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: The applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 1998;94:73‑85.
  9. Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS. Applicability of Demirjian’s method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:54‑62.
  10. Macha M, Lamba B, Avula JS, Muthineni S, Margana PG, Chitoori P. Estimation of correlation between chronological age, skeletal age and dental age in children: A cross‑sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC01‑4.
  11. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Bonne B. Third molar formation and its development course. Angle Orthod 1962;32:270‑9.
  12. Cho SM, Hwang CJ. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular third molar development in adolescents. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:120‑9.
  13. Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod 2012;82:501‑6.
  14. Galstaun G. A study of ossification as observed in Indian subjects. Ind J Med 1937;25:267‑324.
  15. Basu SK, Basu S. Medico‑legal aspects of determination of age of Bengali girls. Ind Med Res 1938;58:97‑100.
  16. Hepworth SM. Determination of age in Indians from a study of ossification of ossification of the epiphysis of long bones. Ind Med Gaz 1939;74:614‑6.
  17. Lal R, Nat BS. Age of epiphyseal union at the elbow and wrist joints among Indians. Indian J Med Res 1934;21:683‑9.
  18. Pillai MJ. The study of epiphyseal union for determining the age of South Indians. Indian J Med Res 1936;23:1015‑7.
  19. Flecker H. Roentgenographic observations of the times of appearance of epiphyses and their fusion with the diaphyses. J Anat 1933;67:118‑64.